A multicriteria additive model to support negotiations An application in the construction industry

被引:0
作者
Schramm, Fernando [1 ]
Silva, Vanessa B. S. [2 ]
Morais, Danielle Costa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Acad Unit Prod Engn, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Ctr Sustainable Dev Semi Arid, Sume, Paraiba, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Prod Engn, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
来源
PROCEEDINGS 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC) | 2012年
关键词
Negotiation; Automated negotiation; Mediation; Construction Industry; MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY MEASUREMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The process of negotiation between buyers and suppliers has different objectives conflicting with each other beyond issues related to the price of a product or service. In this scenario, each party develops his/her own strategy, normally using a win-lose approach. In some situations the final outcome of negotiation implies in a loss for both, which can influence others issues involved in the process beyond price. The objective of this paper is to present a multicriteria additive model to support a bilateral and multi-issue negotiation between a buyer and a material supplier (seller). Moreover, it is presented an application of the model in the construction industry. The main contribution of the paper is related to structuring and standardizing a multiissue negotiation support system which tackles how best this industry might contract suppliers. The results indicate that it is possible to develop win-win strategies and to establish a better outcome for both parties.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 604
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Decision quality using ranked attribute weights
    Barron, FH
    Barrett, BE
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (11) : 1515 - 1523
  • [2] SMARTS AND SMARTER - IMPROVED SIMPLE METHODS FOR MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY MEASUREMENT
    EDWARDS, W
    BARRON, FH
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 60 (03) : 306 - 325
  • [3] HOW TO USE MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY MEASUREMENT FOR SOCIAL DECISIONMAKING
    EDWARDS, W
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1977, 7 (05): : 326 - 340
  • [4] Interactive multiple-criteria methods for reaching Pareto optimal agreements in negotiations
    Ehtamo, H
    Hämäläinen, RP
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2001, 10 (06) : 475 - 491
  • [5] Fisher R., 1978, International Mediation: A Working Guide
  • [6] A formal basis for negotiation support system research
    Holsapple, CW
    Lai, HC
    Whinston, AB
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1998, 7 (03) : 203 - 227
  • [7] Keeney RL, 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences, and Value Tradeoffs
  • [8] Negotiating complex contracts
    Klein, M
    Faratin, P
    Sayama, H
    Bar-Yam, Y
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2003, 12 (02) : 111 - 125
  • [9] Efficient multi-attribute negotiation with incomplete information
    Lai, Guoming
    Li, Cuihong
    Sycara, Katia
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2006, 15 (05) : 511 - 528
  • [10] Lin R.J., 2004, ELECTRON COMMER R A, V3, P126, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ELERAP.2004.02.002.