EVALUATE PUBLIC-PRIVATE-PARTNERSHIP'S ADVANCEMENT USING DOUBLE HIERARCHY HESITANT FUZZY LINGUISTIC PROMETHEE WITH SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE INFORMATION FROM STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE

被引:39
作者
Liu, Nana [1 ]
He, Yue [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Comp & Software, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Public-Private-Partnership; double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; PRO-METHEE; subjective and objective information fusion; DECISION-MAKING; LOCATION SELECTION; ENTROPY; PPP; MANAGEMENT; PROJECTS; SETS;
D O I
10.3846/tede.2019.7588
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) as an efficient mode to provide public services through the government and social capital's cooperation has been in China for more than 30 years. In this paper, we propose an approach to evaluate PPP's advancement in different areas based on the subjective and objective information fusion. At first, we establish an index system from the perspective of the stakeholder. Then, considering that double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (DHHFLTS) that has two hierarchies of linguistic term sets can describe the subjective linguistic information more accurately, it is applied in the paper to depict the subjective information. By applying the entropy of the DHHFLTS, a programming model is proposed to derive the attribute weight through combining subjective evaluation with objective data. In addition, we develop the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic PROMETHEE combining the subjective and objective information (DHHFL-PROMETHEE-S&O) method. At last, we illustrate the index system and the method with the PPP's advancement evaluation problem, and we can find the best choice based on the ranking result. Meanwhile, we also find that the objective information and the subjective information are complementary in the evaluation process.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 420
页数:35
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Stakeholder management in PPP projects: external stakeholders' perspective [J].
Amadi, Chika ;
Carrillo, Patricia ;
Tuuli, Martin .
BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2018, 8 (04) :403-414
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10082791
[3]  
[Anonymous], STAKEHOLDER THEORY S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1964, The Mathematical Theory of Communication
[5]   Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations [J].
Babu, AJG ;
Suresh, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 88 (02) :320-327
[6]  
Brans J. P., 1984, Operational Reseach '84. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, P477
[7]  
Brans J.-P., 2005, PROMETHEE METHODS MU, P163, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_5
[8]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[9]   PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: PERSPECTIVES ON PURPOSES, PUBLICNESS, AND GOOD GOVERNANCE [J].
Brinkerhoff, Derick W. ;
Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 31 (01) :2-14
[10]  
British HM Treasury, 2017, COLL PUBL PRIV PARTN