Novel application of species richness estimators to predict the host range of parasites

被引:12
|
作者
Watson, David M. [1 ]
Milner, Kirsty V. [2 ]
Leigh, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Environm Sci, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Life Sci, 15 Broadway, Ultimo 2007, Australia
关键词
Host range; Host specificity; Sampling; Results-based stopping rule; Parasitic plant; Mistletoe; LYSIANA-EXOCARPI; GEOGRAPHIC RANGE; BIRD COMMUNITIES; SOUTH-AUSTRALIA; SAMPLING EFFORT; NEW-ZEALAND; SPECIFICITY; MISTLETOES; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.10.001
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
Host range is a critical life history trait of parasites, influencing prevalence, virulence and ultimately determining their distributional extent. Current approaches to measure host range are sensitive to sampling effort, the number of known hosts increasing with more records. Here, we develop a novel application of results-based stopping rules to determine how many hosts should be sampled to yield stable estimates of the number of primary hosts within regions, then use species richness estimation to predict host ranges of parasites across their distributional ranges. We selected three mistletoe species (hemiparasitic plants in the Loranthaceae) to evaluate our approach: a strict host specialist (Amyema lucasii, dependent on a single host species), an intermediate species (Amyema quandang, dependent on hosts in one genus) and a generalist (Lysiana exocarpi, dependent on many genera across multiple families), comparing results from geographically-stratified surveys against known host lists derived from herbarium specimens. The results-based stopping rule (stop sampling bioregion once observed host richness exceeds 80% of the host richness predicted using the Abundance-based Coverage Estimator) worked well for most bioregions studied, being satisfied after three to six sampling plots (each representing 25 host trees) but was unreliable in those bioregions with high host richness or high proportions of rare hosts. Although generating stable predictions of host range with minimal variation among six estimators tri-ailed, distribution-wide estimates fell well short of the number of hosts known from herbarium records. This mismatch, coupled with the discovery of nine previously unrecorded mistletoe-host combinations, further demonstrates the limited ecological relevance of simple host-parasite lists. By collecting estimates of host range of constrained completeness, our approach maximises sampling efficiency while generating comparable estimates of the number of primary hosts, with broad applicability to many host parasite systems. (C) 2016 Australian Society for Parasitology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PARASITES AND HOST GEOGRAPHIC RANGE AS ILLUSTRATED BY WATERFOWL
    GREGORY, RD
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1990, 4 (05) : 645 - 654
  • [32] Host Longevity and Parasite Species Richness in Mammals
    Cooper, Natalie
    Kamilar, Jason M.
    Nunn, Charles L.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [33] OBSERVATIONS ON CHYTRIDIACEOUS PARASITES OF PHANEROGAMS .15. HOST RANGE + SPECIES CONCEPT STUDIES IN PHYSODERMA
    SPARROW, FK
    GRIFFIN, JE
    ARCHIV FUR MIKROBIOLOGIE, 1964, 49 (02): : 103 - &
  • [34] SPECIES RICHNESS OF PARASITES ON HOSTS - AGROMYZID FLIES ON THE BRITISH UMBELLIFERAE
    LAWTON, JH
    PRICE, PW
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1979, 48 (02) : 619 - 637
  • [35] What determines parasite species richness across host species?
    Dallas, Tad
    Holian, Lauren A.
    Foster, Grant
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 89 (08) : 1750 - 1753
  • [36] Flea species richness and parameters of host body, host geography and host 'milieu'
    Krasnov, BR
    Shenbrot, GI
    Khokhlova, IS
    Degen, AA
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 73 (06) : 1121 - 1128
  • [37] HOST SPECIFICITY INDEXES OF PARASITES AND THEIR APPLICATION
    ROHDE, K
    EXPERIENTIA, 1980, 36 (12): : 1369 - 1371
  • [38] Parasite species richness in carnivores: effects of host body mass, latitude, geographical range and population density
    Lindenfors, Patrik
    Nunn, Charles L.
    Jones, Kate E.
    Cunningham, Andrew A.
    Sechrest, Wes
    Gittleman, John L.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (04): : 496 - 509
  • [39] Macrofungal diversity of a temperate oak forest: a test of species richness estimators
    Schmit, JP
    Murphy, JF
    Mueller, GM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1999, 77 (07): : 1014 - 1027
  • [40] Evaluating estimators of species richness: the importance of considering statistical error rates
    Gwinn, Daniel C.
    Allen, Michael S.
    Bonvechio, Kimberly I.
    Hoyer, Mark V.
    Beesley, Leah S.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 7 (03): : 294 - 302