Development of unmanned underwater SPT (Standard Penetration Test) equipment

被引:0
作者
Kim, Woo-Tae [1 ]
Jang, In-Sung [1 ]
Ko, Jin-Hwan [1 ]
Han, Sang-Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Bum-Sang [2 ]
机构
[1] KIOST, Coastal Dev & Ocean Energy Res Div, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] POSCO EnC, Civil & Environm Div, Incheon, South Korea
来源
2012 OCEANS | 2012年
关键词
component; offshore structures; offshore geotechnical investigations; seabed type; underwater equipment automated SPT system; CFD analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Various offshore structures such as long-span bridge, offshore wind farm, undersea tunnel and manmade island, etc are now being constructed all around the world. Geotechnical investigations for offshore sites are necessary to the economical and efficient design of the structures. Offshore geotechnical investigations for a site with sea depth lower than 20m are usually accomplished by using SEP-barge and onshore equipment. However, it is very difficult to utilize SEP-barge for a site with sea depth higher than 30m because of severe circumstances including deep sea, high wave and tidal current etc. In this study, seabed type unmanned automated site investigation equipment, which can operate in deep sea conditions (sea depth: 100m, maximum boring depth: 50m), was newly introduced. The underwater equipment is designed to include the underwater boring module, common platform module, remote control module as well as SPT (Standard Penetration Test) module, which is widely utilized at onshore sites. The penetration part in Standard Penetration Test (SPT) equipment has been developed in a closed type in order to adjust underwater environment in this study. This type causes energy dissipated due to the small gap between a closed case and a hammer. This paper deals with the conceptual design of the equipment and specific mechanism of automated SPT system. Also, the dissipation is estimated through CFD analysis. The dissipated energy is computed by less than 2% compared to the potential energy of the hammer with the given gap, subsequently the impact energy of the underwater SPT equipment is under 2% difference as compared to the SPT equipment on land.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Anderson John David, 1995, Computational Fluid Dynamics, V206
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, ANS FLUENT US GUID
[3]  
ANSYS inc, 2010, ANSYS FLUENT UDF MAN
[4]  
Cho SM, 2007, KOR GEOGR RES ASS FA, P638
[5]  
Freudenthal T., 2006, PAGES NEWS, V14
[6]   A NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE TRAIN-INDUCED UNSTEADY AIRFLOW IN A SUBWAY TUNNEL WITH NATURAL VENTILATION DUCTS USING THE DYNAMIC LAYERING METHOD [J].
Huang Yuan-dong ;
Gao Wei ;
Kim Chang-Nyung .
JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2010, 22 (02) :164-172
[7]  
Jang IS, 2007, KOR GEOGR RES ASS FA, P611
[8]  
Kim WT, 2011, KOR GEOGR RES ASS FA, P305
[9]  
Kim WT, 2011, KOR MAR SCI TECHN AS, P2013
[10]  
Korea Highway Corporation, 2002, SPT UT IMPR STUD