Effect of allograft amniotic membrane use on adhesion formation after Cesarean section in pregnant rat

被引:1
作者
Mutlu, A. E. [1 ]
Boztosun, A. [2 ]
Goze, F. [3 ]
Altun, A. [4 ]
Yanik, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sivas State Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, TR-58080 Sivas, Turkey
[2] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Cumhuriyet, Turkey
[3] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Cumhuriyet, Turkey
[4] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Cumhuriyet, Turkey
来源
BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY | 2013年 / 114卷 / 02期
关键词
adhesion; amniotic membrane; rat; uterine horn; cesarean section; ABDOMINAL ADHESIONS; PREVENTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; MULTICENTER; SUPPRESSION; SURGERY; BARRIER; CORNEAL; CELLS;
D O I
10.4149/BLL_2013_015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of allograft amniotic membrane utilization to prevent the post-operative adhesion formation. Background: In 24 pregnant inbreed Wistar-Albino rats, pregnancy was terminated by forming bilateral uterine horn defect via cesarean section at 20th gestational day. Rats were assigned in three groups randomly. Methods: In the first group, abdomen closure was achieved without administration of any intra-peritoneal material following standard surgical intervention. In the second group Seprafilm was used to cover the defect at anterior horn of uterus; whereas amniotic membrane of the rat itself was used in the third group. After 3 weeks, all rats were sacrificed and re-laparotomy was performed to determine adhesions scores. Results: No significant difference was found in adhesion scores between the group 1 and group 3 and also between group 2 and group 3, supporting the previous findings in the literature. Conclusion: We observed that direct application of allograft amniotic membrane, which is an adhesion barrier used after cesarean section, to injured surface had no effect in the prevention of adhesions (Tab. 3, Fig. 5, Ref. 28). Full Text in PDF www.elis.sk.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 66
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Preventing intra-abdominal adhesions with polylactic acid film: An animal study
    Avital, S
    Bollinger, TJ
    Wilkinson, JD
    Marchetti, F
    Hellinger, MD
    Sands, LR
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (01) : 153 - 157
  • [2] Beck D E, 1997, Eur J Surg Suppl, P49
  • [3] A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm® adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine
    Beck, DE
    Cohen, Z
    Fleshman, JW
    Kaufman, HS
    van Goor, H
    Wolff, BG
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (10) : 1310 - 1319
  • [4] Becker JM, 1996, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V183, P297
  • [5] Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions
    Boland, GM
    Weigel, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 132 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [6] Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers
    DeCherney, AH
    diZerega, GS
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 77 (03) : 671 - +
  • [7] Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): A blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study
    Diamond, MP
    Bieber, E
    Coddington, C
    Franklin, R
    Grunert, G
    Gunn, D
    Lotze, E
    Rowe, G
    Grainger, D
    Tjaden, B
    Holtz, G
    Patton, G
    Johns, DA
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 66 (06) : 904 - 910
  • [8] DIZEREGA GS, 1994, FERTIL STERIL, V61, P219
  • [9] The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology
    Dua, HS
    Gomes, JAP
    King, AJ
    Maharajan, VS
    [J]. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 49 (01) : 51 - 77
  • [10] Gomel V, 1996, J REPROD MED, V41, P35