Postharvest sensory and physiochemical attributes of processing and nonprocessing tomato cultivars

被引:47
|
作者
Mohammed, M [1 ]
Wilson, LA [1 ]
Gomes, PI [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ W Indies, Dept Food Prod, Fac Agr & Nat Sci, St Augustine, Trinidad Tobago
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-4557.1999.tb00549.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Fruits of processing and nonprocessing tomato cultivars harvested at the "breaker" stage of maturity were evaluated for changes in physical, chemical and sensory quality characteristics during storage at 20C and 30C after 7, 14 and 21 days. Percentage marketable fruits after 21 days at 20C and 30C were 61.9% and 56.6% for processing cultivars and 65.9% and 50.9% for nonprocessing cultivars. Fruits of the processing cultivars ripened earlier, remained firmer and were less prone to physical injuries than fruits of nonprocessing cultivars. Nonprocessing fruits had a higher mean fruit weight of 17.0 g fruit diameter of 1.10 mm and locule number of 1.3 compared with fruits of the processing cultivars. Nonprecessing fruit cultivars had higher sugar/acid ratios and vitamin C contents as well as lower pH and total titratable acidity than processing fruit cultivars. Accordingly, nonprocessing cultivars on the whole, but specifically Waiters, Floradel, Carnival, Calypso, Star Pak, Floradade and Early Set were most suitable as fresh-market fruits. Excellent processing quality attributes were obtained for Donore, Peto 94C, Rio Grande and Advantage. Among processing cultivars Caraibe, Cascade, Dorado and Neema 1401 gave good dual purpose fruits.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 182
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Postharvest treatments and maturity stages impact sensory attributes and shelf life of tomato fruits var Pearson kept in Zero Energy Cool Chamber .
    Hakimi, Sayed Samiullah
    Raina, Ravinder
    Saharawat, Yashpal Singh
    EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2022, 34 (07): : 586 - 594
  • [42] Postharvest quality and sensory attributes of organically grown Ficus carica L.
    Sortino, G.
    Farina, V
    Gallotta, A.
    Inglese, P.
    Allegra, A.
    VI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FIG, 2021, 1310 : 75 - 79
  • [43] Yield and fruit size distribution of processing tomato cultivars
    Grilli, GVG
    Cintra, AAD
    Santos, GM
    Braz, LT
    Braz, BA
    ADVANCES IN VEGETABLE BREEDING, 2004, (637): : 133 - 137
  • [44] SCREENING OF TOMATO CULTIVARS FOR WHOLE PACK PROCESSING IN ARKANSAS
    HORN, RS
    GONZALEZ, AR
    HORTSCIENCE, 1980, 15 (03) : 281 - 281
  • [45] Agronomic and qualitative evaluation of processing tomato cultivars in Tunisia
    Hdider, C.
    Guezel, I.
    Arfaoui, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE PROCESSING TOMATO, 2007, (758): : 281 - +
  • [46] Analysis of antioxidant compounds and hydroxymethylfurfural in processing tomato cultivars
    Helyes, Lajos
    Lugasi, Andrea
    Pek, Zoltan
    Brandt, Sara
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) : 615 - 619
  • [47] Relationship between Sensory Attributes and Chemical Composition of Different Mango Cultivars
    Sung, Jeehye
    Suh, Joon Hyuk
    Chambers, Alan H.
    Crane, Jonathan
    Wang, Yu
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2019, 67 (18) : 5177 - 5188
  • [48] SENSORY ATTRIBUTES OF APPLE CULTIVARS, AND THE REGRESSION CORRELATION BETWEEN SENSORY ATTRIBUTE RATINGS AND OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS
    WATADA, AE
    ABBOTT, JA
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 184 (SEP): : 57 - AGFD
  • [49] Effect of tomato cultivars, honey finisher and processing methods on quality of tomato ketchup
    Temesgen, M.
    Workneh, T. S.
    Bultossa, G.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 10 (80): : 18516 - 18527
  • [50] SENSORY QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF BUTTERHEAD LETTUCE CULTIVARS GROWN IN ARID CONDITIONS
    ALSADON, AA
    HORTSCIENCE, 1993, 28 (02) : 159 - 160