Aortic valve replacement with sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis: Single-center experience

被引:1
作者
Souaf-Khalafi, Souhayla [1 ]
Fernandez-Gonzalez, Angel L. [1 ]
Baluja-Gonzalez, Maria A. [2 ]
Sierra-Quiroga, Juan L. [1 ]
Adrio-Nazar, Belen [1 ]
Garcia-Carro, Javier [1 ]
Martinez-Cereijo, Jose M. [1 ]
Duran-Munoz, Dario N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Complejo Hosp Univ Santiago de Compostela, Serv Cirugia Cardiaca, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Complejo Hosp Univ Santiago de Compostela, Serv Anestesiol & Reanimac, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
来源
CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR | 2019年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
Aortic valve replacement; Perceval S; Aortic valve stenosis; Biological prosthesis; Review; RISK PATIENTS; TRANSCATHETER; IMPLANTATION; PROSTHESIS; STENOSIS; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES; COST; MINITHORACOTOMY; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.circv.2019.01.075
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and objectives: Sutureless aortic valve replacement has emerged as an alternative for surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis, especially in older patients. This is an observational, retrospective study of a group of patients from a single centre undergoing aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless bioprosthesis (LivaNova, Saluggia, Italy). Methods: A total of 105 patients had an aortic valve replacement with a Perceval S bioprosthesis between June 2015 and October 2018. The combined procedures were, mitral valve replacement (n=1), tricuspid valve repair (n=2), myocardial revascularisation (n =16), and myectomy (n=1). The clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at discharge, at 6 months, and yearly, after surgery. Results: The mean age was 80.5 +/- 3.8 years, and 57 (54.3%) were women. The mortality rate at 30 days was 1.9% (2 out of 105).The 30-day survival rate was 98%, and at one year it was 95%. The mean Euroscore II was 3.8% + 5.5%. The cardiopulmonary bypass and ischaemia times were 58.4 +/- 41.8 min, and 44 +/- 19.9 min for isolated aortic valve replacement, 94.2 +/- 44.1 min and 73.9 +/- 35.6 min for combined procedures, respectively. The mean trans-prosthetic gradient was 13.5 +/- 4.9 mmHg. The left ventricle function increased from 56.8% +/- 10.8% to 58.6% +/- 11.1%. Only 7 patients have required a definitive pacemaker implant (6.7%). Only 2 patients presented with a moderate para-valvular leak that did not require any treatment. Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S sutureless bioprosthesis is associated with low mortality and excellent clinical and haemodynamic behaviour, especially in elderly patients. (C) 2019 Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Toracica-Cardiovascular. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Early single-center experience with the 3F-enable aortic valve bioprosthesis [J].
Leyh, Rainer ;
Yildirim, Chagatay ;
Buck, Thomas ;
Sommer, Sebastian ;
Herold, Ulf ;
Jakob, Heinz .
HERZ, 2006, 31 (05) :423-428
[42]   Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients [J].
Mujtaba, Syed Saleem ;
Ledingham, Simon M. ;
Shah, Asif Raza ;
Pillay, Thasee ;
Schueler, Stephan ;
Clark, Stephen .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 33 (02) :122-128
[43]   Risk predictors that impact long-term prognosis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis [J].
Dokollari, Aleksander ;
Margaryan, Rafik ;
Torregrossa, Gianluca ;
Sicouri, Serge ;
Cameli, Matteo ;
Mandoli, Giulia Elena ;
Prifti, Edvin ;
Veshti, Altin ;
Bonacchi, Massimo ;
Gelsomino, Sandro .
CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55 :10-19
[44]   Sutureless aortic valve replacement: an alternative to transcatheter aortic valve implantation? [J].
Lorusso, Roberto ;
Gelsomino, Sandro ;
Renzulli, Attilio .
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 28 (02) :158-163
[45]   Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study [J].
Kapadia, Sharan J. ;
Salmasi, Mohammed Yousuf ;
Zientara, Alicja ;
Roussin, Isabelle ;
Quarto, Cesare ;
Asimakopoulos, George .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 19 (01)
[46]   Thrombocytopenia Following Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement in Asian Patients [J].
Nakayama, Taisuke ;
Nakamura, Yoshitsugu ;
Shikata, Fumiaki ;
Ushijima, Masaki ;
Yasumoto, Yuto ;
Yoshiyama, Daiki ;
Kuroda, Miho ;
Sawa, Shintaro ;
Tsuruta, Ryo ;
Furutachi, Akira ;
Narita, Takuya ;
Ito, Yujiro .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2024, 88 (04) :549-558
[47]   Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study [J].
Sharan J Kapadia ;
Mohammed Yousuf Salmasi ;
Alicja Zientara ;
Isabelle Roussin ;
Cesare Quarto ;
George Asimakopoulos .
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 19
[48]   Sutureless aortic valve replacement in stentless bioprosthesis failure [J].
Kim, Jae Hyun ;
Kim, Jae-Bum ;
Choi, Sae Young .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 21 (06) :801-802
[49]   Challenge for Perceval: Aortic Valve Replacement With Small Sutureless Valves-A Multicenter Study [J].
Villa, Emmanuel ;
Messina, Antonio ;
Laborde, Francois ;
Shrestha, Malakh ;
Troise, Giovanni ;
Zannis, Konstantinos ;
Haverich, Axel ;
Elfarra, Mazen ;
Folliguet, Thierry .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 99 (04) :1248-1254
[50]   Thrombocytopenia Associated with Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients: A Word of Caution [J].
Albacker, Turki B. .
HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2015, 18 (03) :E93-E97