Favorable Biochemical Freedom From Recurrence With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up

被引:3
作者
Ricco, Anthony [1 ]
Barbera, Gabrielle [2 ]
Lanciano, Rachelle [3 ,4 ]
Feng, Jing [4 ]
Hanlon, Alexandra [5 ]
Lozano, Alicia [5 ]
Good, Michael [4 ]
Arrigo, Stephen [3 ,4 ]
Lamond, John [3 ,4 ]
Yang, Jun [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ Hlth Syst, Richmond, VA USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Crozer Keystone Hlth Syst, Radiat Oncol, Springfield, PA 19064 USA
[4] Philadelphia CyberKnife Ctr, Havertown, PA 19083 USA
[5] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
prostate cancer; SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy); high risk prostate cancer; prostate SBRT treatment; intermediate risk prostate cancer; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MULTIINSTITUTIONAL CONSORTIUM; NADIR LEVEL; RADIOTHERAPY; TOXICITY; TRIAL; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; PATTERNS; PHASE-2;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.01505
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objective(s):The current study reports long-term overall survival (OS) and biochemical freedom from recurrence (BFFR) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer in a single community hospital setting with early adoption. Materials/Methods:Ninety-seven consecutive men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with SBRT between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. Categorical variables for analysis included National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, race, Gleason grade group, T stage, use of androgen deprivation therapy, and planning target volume dose. Continuous variables for analysis included pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percent cores positive, age at diagnosis, PSA nadir, prostate volume, percent prostate that received 40 Gy, and minimum dose to 0.03 cc of prostate (Dmin). BFFR was assessed using the Phoenix nadir +2 definition. OS and BFFR were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology with comparisons accomplished using log-rank statistics. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was accomplished with a backwards selection Cox proportional-hazards model with statistical significance taken at thep< 0.05 level. Results:Median FU is 78.4 months. Five- and ten-year OS KM estimates are 90.9 and 73.2%, respectively, with 19 deaths recorded. MVA reveals pretreatment PSA (p= 0.032), percent prostate 40 Gy (p= 0.003), and race (p= 0.031) were predictive of OS. Five- and nine-year BFFR KM estimates are 92.1 and 87.5%, respectively, with 10 biochemical failures recorded. MVA revealed PSA nadir (p< 0.001) was the only factor predictive of BFFR. Specifically, for every one-unit increase in PSA nadir, there was a 4.2-fold increased odds of biochemical failure (HR = 4.248). No significant differences in BFFR were found between favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer (p= 0.054) with 7-year KM estimates of 96.6, 81.0, and 85.7%, respectively. Conclusions:Favorable OS and BFFR can be expected after SBRT for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer with non-significant differences seen for BFFR between favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, and high-risk groups. Our 5-year BFFR compares favorably with the HYPO-RT-PC trial of 84%. PSA nadir was predictive of biochemical failure. This study is ultimately limited by the small absolute number of high-risk patients included.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Dose escalation for prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR): Late outcomes from two prospective clinical trials
    Alayed, Yasir
    Cheung, Patrick
    Pang, Geordi
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    D'Alimonte, Laura
    Deabreu, Andrea
    Commisso, Kristina
    Commisso, Angela
    Zhang, Liang
    Quon, Harvey C.
    Musunuru, Hima Bindu
    Helou, Joelle
    Loblaw, D. Andrew
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 (02) : 213 - 218
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, NCCN GUIDELINES PROS
  • [3] Outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy boost for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer
    Anwar, Mekhail
    Weinberg, Vivian V.
    Seymour, Zachary
    Hsu, I. Joe
    Roach, Mack, III
    Gottschalk, Alex R.
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [4] A single-center study of 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Bolzicco, Giampaolo
    Favretto, Maria Silvia
    Satariano, Ninfa
    Scremin, Enrico
    Tambone, Carmelo
    Tasca, Andrea
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [5] Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Clinical Results
    Bolzicco, Giampaolo
    Favretto, Maria Silvia
    Scremin, Enrico
    Tambone, Carmelo
    Tasca, Andrea
    Guglielmi, Rosabianca
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2010, 9 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [6] Early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics following prostate carcinoma radiotherapy - Prognostic value of a time-and-PSA threshold model
    Cavanaugh, SX
    Kupelian, PA
    Fuller, CD
    Reddy, C
    Bradshaw, P
    Pollock, BH
    Fuss, M
    [J]. CANCER, 2004, 101 (01) : 96 - 105
  • [7] Cushman Taylor R, 2019, Oncotarget, V10, P5660, DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.27177
  • [8] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Toxicity and Biochemical Disease-Free Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Patient Registry
    Davis, Joanne
    Sharma, Sanjeev
    Shumway, Richard
    Perry, David
    Bydder, Sean
    Simpson, C. Kelley
    D'Ambrosio, David
    [J]. CUREUS, 2015, 7 (12):
  • [9] Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with CyberKnife in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: preliminary results
    Fan, Chao-Yueh
    Chao, Hsing-Lung
    Huang, Wen-Yen
    Lin, Chun-Shu
    Chen, Chang-Ming
    Lo, Cheng-Hsiang
    [J]. TUMORI JOURNAL, 2015, 101 (06): : 684 - 691
  • [10] Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Trial of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with Temporary Hydrogel Spacer for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Folkert, M. R.
    Zelefsky, M. J.
    Hannan, R.
    Desai, N. B.
    Lotan, Y.
    Laine, A. M.
    Kim, D. W. N.
    Hardee, S.
    Hornberger, B.
    Kollmeier, M. A.
    McBride, S.
    Xie, X. J.
    Roehrborn, C.
    Timmerman, R. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (05): : 1319 - 1320