Prostaglandin E2 gel versus misoprostol for cervical ripening in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks

被引:21
作者
Frohn, WE [1 ]
Simmons, S [1 ]
Carlan, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Arnold Palmer Hosp Children & Women, Div Orlando Reg Healthcare, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01677-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare intravaginal misoprostol to prostaglandin (PG) E-2 for cervical ripening in women with premature rapture of the membranes (PROM) after 34 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Women with PROM after 34 weeks of gestation and an unripe cervix were randomized to receive PGE(2) (2.5 mg) or misoprostol (50 mug). Both agents were placed intravaginally immediately after randomization, and the dose was repeated 6 hours later if necessary. After another 6 hours from the second insertion, oxytocin treatment was started if labor had not begun. Forty patients in each group were required to show a 30% improvement in delivery within 12 hours in the misoprostol group. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were randomized; 54 were assigned to misoprostol and 55 to PGE(2). Important demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean time from first insertion to delivery was 16.4 hours in the misoprostol group and 22.0 hours in the PGE(2) group. A second dose was required less frequently in the misoprostol group (22% vs 62% in the PGE(2) group), and the percentage of patients delivered within 12 hours was higher in the misoprostol group (41% vs 16%). Tachysystole occurred in 20% and 6% of women in the misoprostol and PGE(2) groups, respectively. Hyperstimulation occurred in 9% and 0%, and cesarean delivery in 19% and 26% of women in the misoprostol and PGE(2) groups, respectively. Neonatal outcome was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol is more effective than local PGE(2) application to treat PROM after 34 weeks of gestation, but tachysystole occurs more commonly with misoprostol. (C) 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 210
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Risk factors for neonatal sepsis in offspring of women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at 34-42 weeks [J].
Ladfors, L ;
Tessin, I ;
Mattsson, LA ;
Eriksson, M ;
Seeberg, S ;
Fall, O .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (02) :94-101
[12]   Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. [J].
Lydon-Rochelle, M ;
Holt, VL ;
Easterling, TR ;
Martin, DP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (01) :3-8
[13]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF MANAGEMENT OF PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM IN MULTIPAROUS WOMEN USING VAGINAL PROSTAGLANDIN GEL [J].
MAHMOOD, TA ;
DICK, MJW .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (01) :71-74
[14]   Clinical amnionitis and endometritis in patients with premature rupture of membranes: Endocervical prostaglandin E(2) gel versus oxytocin for induction of labor [J].
Malik, N ;
Gittens, L ;
Gonzalez, D ;
Bardeguez, A ;
Ganesh, V ;
Apuzzio, J .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04) :540-543
[15]   INDUCTION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT IN PREMATURE RUPTURE OF THE MEMBRANES WITH MATURE AMNIOTIC-FLUID AT 32 TO 36 WEEKS - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
MERCER, BM ;
CROCKER, LG ;
BOE, NM ;
SIBAI, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (04) :775-782
[16]   Premature rupture of membranes at term: A metaanalysis of three management schemes [J].
Mozurkewich, EL ;
Wolf, FM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (06) :1035-1043
[17]   Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks' gestation: Aggressive versus conservative management [J].
Naef, RW ;
Allbert, JR ;
Ross, EL ;
Weber, BM ;
Martin, RW ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (01) :126-130
[18]   Timing of labor induction after premature rupture of membranes between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation [J].
Neerhof, MG ;
Cravello, C ;
Haney, EI ;
Silver, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (02) :349-352
[19]   Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes [J].
Ngai, SW ;
Chan, YM ;
Lam, SW ;
Lao, TT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (02) :222-227
[20]   Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor [J].
Nunes, F ;
Rodrigues, R ;
Meirinho, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (03) :626-629