Clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy

被引:10
作者
Drouin, Sarah J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Comperat, Eva [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cussenot, Olivier [3 ,4 ]
Bitker, Marc-Olivier [1 ]
Haertig, Alain [1 ]
Roupret, Morgan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Urol, Paris, France
[2] GHU EST, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Pathol, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 06, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Etud & Rech Pathol Prostat, CeRePP, Paris, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; Radical prostatectomy; Prostate-specific antigen; Biochemical recurrence; Prognosis; CANCER; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; MEN; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; CANDIDATES; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.04.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: We collected data from 495 patients who underwent RP during an 8-year period. We have then selected those who would have been eligible for AS according to 2 different sets of published criteria. Group I. used broader criteria: clinical stage <= T2b, Gleason score of seven or less and PSA <= 15 ng/ml. Group 2 used more restrictive criteria: age < 75 years, PSA < 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c or T2a, Gleason score of 6 or less, at least 10 biopsies available and a tumor length of less than 3 mm in 2 biopsy cores. Results: Overall, 207 patients (41.8%) were included in group 1 and 43 (8.7%) in group 2. The median follow-up was 31(3-108) and 32 (3-84) months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. We recorded 132 cases (63.8%) of pT2c in group 1 and 31 in group 2 (72.1%). Extracapsular extension was noted in 37 (17.9%) and 2 (4.7%) specimens from groups 1 and 2, respectively. In groups 1 and 2, a biochemical failure occurred in 47 patients (22.7%) and 6 (14%), respectively. The Gleason score at biopsy was underestimated in 54 (26%) and 9 (21%) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, 21% to 26% of patients eligible for AS had upgraded Gleason scores at prostatectomy and actually had a more significant disease with a potentially aggressive behavior. Therefore, based on criteria, certain tumors currently selected for AS may be significant and may require radical treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 407
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Staging saturation biopsy in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance protocol [J].
Abouassaly, Robert ;
Lane, Brian R. ;
Jones, J. Stephen .
UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (04) :573-577
[2]   20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[3]   Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors - A contemporary analysis [J].
Bastian, PJ ;
Mangold, LA ;
Epstein, JI ;
Partin, AW .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (09) :2001-2005
[4]   Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging With Immediate Repeat Biopsy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance [J].
Berglund, Ryan K. ;
Masterson, Timothy A. ;
Vora, Kinjal C. ;
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand D. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (05) :1964-1967
[5]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, A ;
Holmberg, L ;
Ruutu, M ;
Häggman, M ;
Andersson, SO ;
Bratell, S ;
Spångberg, A ;
Busch, C ;
Nordling, S ;
Garmo, H ;
Palmgren, J ;
Adami, HO ;
Norlén, BJ ;
Johansson, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) :1977-1984
[6]   The epidemiology of prostate cancer [J].
Boyle, P ;
Severi, G ;
Giles, GG .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 30 (02) :209-+
[7]   Biopsy Core Number Represents One of Foremost Predictors of Clinically Significant Gleason Sum Upgrading in Patients With Low-risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Jeldres, Claudio ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Montorsi, Francesco .
UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (05) :1087-1091
[8]   Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression [J].
Choo, R ;
Klotz, L ;
Danjoux, C ;
Morton, GC ;
DeBoer, G ;
Szumacher, E ;
Fleshner, N ;
Bunting, P ;
Hruby, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1664-1669
[9]   Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men [J].
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Ahyai, Sascha A. ;
Walz, Jochen ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Erbersdobler, Andreas ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
CANCER, 2008, 113 (04) :701-709
[10]   Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer [J].
Conti, Simon L. ;
Dall'Era, Marc ;
Fradet, Vincent ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Simko, Jeffery ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) :1628-1633