The politics of transition? Explaining political crises in the implementation of the Belfast Good Friday Agreement

被引:19
作者
Ruane, J [1 ]
Todd, J
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Dept Sociol, Cork, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Dublin, Dept Polit, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9248.00347
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The implementation of the Belfast or Good Friday Agreement has been marked by recurring crises. While each of these has its specific causes, they arc symptomatic of contradictions in the underlying conditions of conflict. These made the Belfast Agreement possible, but they also create difficulties in its implementation. The Agreement echoes - not least in its ambiguities - the underlying contradictions, reconstituting the political terrain in terms of them. This has reproduced the tendency toward conflict even among the supporters of the Agreement, whose different responses and ends-in-view reflect the objective uncertainties in the situation. Political crises are likely to continue even after the full implementation of the Agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 940
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
McCrudden C., 1999, FORDHAM INT LAW J, V22, P1696
[22]  
MCLAUGHLIN M, 1998, REPUBLICAN IDEAL CUR, P62
[23]  
O'Leary B, 1999, NEW LEFT REV, P66
[24]  
O'Leary B., 1993, POLITICS ANTAGONISM
[25]  
OLEARY B, 2000, SUNDAY BUSINESS 0430
[26]  
Pollak Andy, 1993, CITIZENS INQUIRY OPS
[27]  
ROLSTON W, 1999, POLITICS PERFORMANCE, P29
[28]  
RUANE J, 1999, GOOD FRIDAY AGREEMEN, P145
[29]  
RUANE J, 2000, CIVITAS EUROPAS, V4, P121
[30]  
RUANE J, 2001, IRELAND WORLD STAGE