Assessing communities of practice in health policy: a conceptual framework as a first step towards empirical research

被引:37
作者
Bertone, Maria Paola [1 ]
Meessen, Bruno [1 ]
Clarysse, Guy [2 ]
Hercot, David [1 ]
Kelley, Allison
Kafando, Yamba [3 ]
Lange, Isabelle [4 ]
Pfaffmann, Jerome [2 ]
Ridde, Valery [3 ,5 ]
Sieleunou, Isidore [1 ]
Witter, Sophie [6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, Dept Publ Hlth, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] UNICEF West & Cent Africa Reg Off WCARO, Dakar, Senegal
[3] Inst Rech Sci Sante IRSS 03, Dept Sante Publ & Biol Med, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
[4] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Maternal & Neonatal Hlth Grp, London WC1E 7HT, England
[5] Univ Montreal, Res Ctr, Hosp Ctr CRCHUM Tour St Antoine, Montreal, PQ H2X 0A9, Canada
[6] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
来源
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS | 2013年 / 11卷
关键词
Communities of practice; Evaluation; Health policy; Knowledge management; Knowledge translation; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; CARE; LESSONS; SECTOR; IMPLEMENTATION; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1186/1478-4505-11-39
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Communities of Practice (CoPs) are groups of people that interact regularly to deepen their knowledge on a specific topic. Thanks to information and communication technologies, CoPs can involve experts distributed across countries and adopt a 'transnational' membership. This has allowed the strategy to be applied to domains of knowledge such as health policy with a global perspective. CoPs represent a potentially valuable tool for producing and sharing explicit knowledge, as well as tacit knowledge and implementation practices. They may also be effective in creating links among the different 'knowledge holders' contributing to health policy (e.g., researchers, policymakers, technical assistants, practitioners, etc.). CoPs in global health are growing in number and activities. As a result, there is an increasing need to document their progress and evaluate their effectiveness. This paper represents a first step towards such empirical research as it aims to provide a conceptual framework for the analysis and assessment of transnational CoPs in health policy. The framework is developed based on the findings of a literature review as well as on our experience, and reflects the specific features and challenges of transnational CoPs in health policy. It organizes the key elements of CoPs into a logical flow that links available resources and the capacity to mobilize them, with knowledge management activities and the expansion of knowledge, with changes in policy and practice and, ultimately, with an improvement in health outcomes. Additionally, the paper addresses the challenges in the operationalization and empirical application of the framework.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Influence of Research on Health Policy and Clinical Practice [J].
Rahman H. .
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2017, 67 (5) :319-323
[22]   Applying an equity lens to assess context and implementation in public health and health services research and practice using the PRISM framework [J].
Fort, Meredith P. ;
Manson, Spero M. ;
Glasgow, Russell E. .
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2023, 3
[23]   A relational conceptual framework for multidisciplinary health research centre infrastructure [J].
Stephanie E Coen ;
Joan L Bottorff ;
Joy L Johnson ;
Pamela A Ratner .
Health Research Policy and Systems, 8
[24]   Recognition of social health: A conceptual framework in the context of dementia research [J].
Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra ;
Verspoor, Eline ;
Samtani, Suraj ;
Sachdev, Perminder S. ;
Ikram, M. Arfan ;
Vernooij, Meike W. ;
Hubers, Claudia ;
Chattat, Rabih ;
Lenart-Bugla, Marta ;
Rymaszewska, Joanna ;
Szczesniak, Dorota ;
Brodaty, Henry ;
Welmer, Anna-Karin ;
Maddock, Jane ;
van der Velpen, Isabelle F. ;
Wiegelmann, Henrik ;
Marseglia, Anna ;
Richards, Marcus ;
Melis, Rene ;
de Vugt, Marjolein ;
Moniz-Cook, Esme ;
Jeon, Yun-Hee ;
Perry, Marieke ;
Wolf-Ostermann, Karin .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
[25]   A relational conceptual framework for multidisciplinary health research centre infrastructure [J].
Coen, Stephanie E. ;
Bottorff, Joan L. ;
Johnson, Joy L. ;
Ratner, Pamela A. .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 8
[26]   Towards rigorous practice: A framework for assessing naturalistic evaluations in the development sector [J].
Phillips, Tracey ;
de Wet, Jacques P. .
EVALUATION, 2017, 23 (01) :102-120
[27]   A review and analysis of accountability in global health funding, research collaborations and training: towards conceptual clarity and better practice [J].
Liwanag, Harvy Joy ;
James, Oria ;
Frahsa, Annika .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 8 (12)
[28]   Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice [J].
Salloch, Sabine ;
Schildmann, Jan ;
Vollmann, Jochen .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 13
[29]   Research translation for military and veteran health: research, practice, policy [J].
Haibach, Jeffrey P. ;
Hoerster, Katherine D. ;
Dorflinger, Lindsey ;
McAndrew, Lisa M. ;
Cassidy, Daniel G. ;
Goodrich, David E. ;
Bormann, Jill E. ;
Lowery, Julie ;
Asch, Steven M. ;
Raffa, Susan D. ;
Moin, Tannaz ;
Peterson, Alan L. ;
Goldstein, Michael G. ;
Neal-Walden, Tracy ;
Talcott, Gerald W. ;
Hunter, Christopher L. ;
Knight, Sara J. .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (02) :631-641
[30]   Toward the Systematic Study of Feminist Policy in Practice:An Essential First Step [J].
Mazur, Amy G. .
JOURNAL OF WOMEN POLITICS & POLICY, 2017, 38 (01) :64-83