Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery - An evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies

被引:48
|
作者
Ruurda, JP [1 ]
Broeders, IAMJ [1 ]
Simmermacher, RPM [1 ]
Rinkes, IHMB [1 ]
Van Vroonhoven, TJMV [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
robotics; laparoscopy; surgery; cholecystectomy;
D O I
10.1097/00129689-200202000-00007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic surgery offers patients distinct benefits but is not without its disadvantages to surgeons in terms of maneuverability and visualization. Robotic telemanipulation systems were introduced with the objective of providing a solution to the problems in this field of surgery. The feasibility of robot-assisted surgery was assessed by performing 35 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with the da Vinci robotic system. Time necessary for system setup and operation was recorded, as were complications, technical problems, postoperative hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Thirty-four of 35 cholecystectomy procedures were completed laparoscopically with the da Vinci system. Technical problems occurred in three cases, resulting in one intraoperative complication (a minilaparotomy caused by the loss of an instrument part), Median hospitalization was 2 days. There were no postoperative deaths or morbidity within 30 days after surgery. System setup time decreased as the experience of the operating team increased. Operating times were comparable with those reported for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Robot-assisted surgery was repeatedly proven as a safe and feasible approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 45
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: A review
    Salloum, C.
    Lim, C.
    Malek, A.
    Compagnon, P.
    Azoulay, D.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2016, 153 (06) : 447 - 456
  • [42] Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Urachal Excision in Children
    Ahmed, Haris
    Howe, Adam S.
    Dyer, Lori L.
    Fine, Ronnie G.
    Gitlin, Jordan S.
    Schlussel, Richard N.
    Zelkovic, Paul F.
    Palmer, Lane S.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 106 : 103 - 106
  • [43] Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Rozet, Francois
    Harmon, Justin
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Barret, Eric
    Vallancien, Guy
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 24 (02) : 171 - 179
  • [44] Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: Comparison with abdominal myomectomy
    Ranisavljevic, N.
    Mercier, G.
    Masia, F.
    Mares, P.
    De Tayrac, R.
    Triopon, G.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2012, 41 (05): : 439 - 444
  • [45] Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for Menetrier’s disease
    Rodríguez Gonzalez O.
    José R.
    Génesis J.
    Luis M.
    Liumariel V.
    Raquel F.
    Alexis S.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2015, 9 (3) : 257 - 261
  • [46] Cost Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
    Seideman, Casey A.
    Sleeper, Joshua P.
    Lotan, Yair
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (08) : 1044 - 1048
  • [47] Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Francois Rozet
    Justin Harmon
    Xavier Cathelineau
    Eric Barret
    Guy Vallancien
    World Journal of Urology, 2006, 24 : 171 - 179
  • [48] European basic laparoscopic urological skills: a feasibility study in a setting for robot-assisted surgery
    Liakos, Nikolaos
    Janssen, Martin
    Moritz, Rudolf
    Kayaci-Guener, Oezlem
    Bruendl, Johannes
    Oezkan, Arif
    Ubrig, Burkhard
    Siemer, Stefan
    Gratzke, Christian
    Wagner, Christian
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 12
  • [49] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY: SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
    Rocco, B.
    Coelho, R. F.
    Albo, G.
    Patel, V. R.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2010, 62 (03) : 295 - 304
  • [50] Comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional laparoscopic myomectomy
    Hsiao, Sheng-Mou
    Lin, Ho-Hsiung
    Peng, Fu-Shaing
    Jen, Pei-Jung
    Hsiao, Chin-Fen
    Tu, Fung-Chao
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (05) : 1024 - 1029