共 50 条
Use of the Larval Tarsal Test to determine acaricide resistance in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Brazilian field populations
被引:30
作者:
Lovis, L.
[1
,2
]
Mendes, M. C.
[3
]
Perret, J. -L.
[2
]
Martins, J. R.
[4
]
Bouvier, J.
[2
]
Betschart, B.
[1
]
Sager, H.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Biol, Parasitol Lab, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[2] Novartis Anim Hlth Res Ctr, CH-1566 St Aubin, FR, Switzerland
[3] Inst Biol, Ctr Pesquisa & Desenvolvimento Sanidade Anim, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Fundacao Estadual Pesquisa Agr, Inst Pesquisas Vet Desiderio Finamor, Parasitol Lab, Eldorado Do Sul, RS, Brazil
关键词:
Larval Tarsal Test;
Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus;
Brazil;
Acaricide resistance;
Tick;
CATTLE TICK;
IXODIDAE;
IVERMECTIN;
DIAGNOSIS;
BIOASSAYS;
FIPRONIL;
STATE;
LC50;
SUL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.011
中图分类号:
R38 [医学寄生虫学];
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
100103 ;
摘要:
Acaricide resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus is widespread in most of the countries where this parasite is present. Bioassays are used to diagnose the level and pattern of resistance in tick populations. In the present study, we describe a detailed protocol of the Larval Tarsal Test (LTT) using simplified equipment and data on the resistance of 17 tick field populations originating from 5 Brazilian states. Nine acaricidal compounds from 5 major classes were tested: organophosphates (OP), synthetic pyrethroids (SP), macrocyclic lactones (ML), phenylpyrazols (PYZ) and amidines. For comparison, four of the tick populations were also tested with the Larval Packet Test (LPT) with one compound per class. The most common resistances were to SP, amitraz and OP, with frequencies of 94%, 88% and 82%, respectively. Resistance to PYZ was also found to be widespread (65%), suggesting a rapid development of fipronil resistance in Brazil. One case of ML resistance and 2 cases of suspected ML resistance were identified with the LTT. The m led to higher resistance ratios to all compounds than the LPT, reflecting its high sensitivity to detect resistance. Finally, the LIT allowed testing a larger number of compounds and doses with reduced labour in comparison to the LPT and turned out to be a reliable bioassay to detect resistance in field populations. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 331
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条