Player Monitoring in Indoor Team Sports: Concurrent Validity of Inertial Measurement Units to Quantify Average and Peak Acceleration Values

被引:36
作者
Roell, Mareike [1 ]
Roecker, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Gehring, Dominic [1 ]
Mahler, Hubert [1 ]
Gollhofer, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Dept Sports & Sport Sci, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Furtwangen Univ, Appl Publ Hlth, Furtwangen, Germany
关键词
locomotion analysis; orientation estimation; inertial measurement unit; complementary filter; physical demands; indoor team sports; TIME-MOTION ANALYSIS; TRUNK-MOUNTED ACCELEROMETER; TRACKING SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGICAL DEMANDS; ORIENTATION FILTER; BASKETBALL PLAYERS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; KALMAN-FILTER; 10; HZ; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3389/fphys.2018.00141
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The increasing interest in assessing physical demands in team sports has led to the development of multiple sports related monitoring systems. Due to technical limitations, these systems primarily could be applied to outdoor sports, whereas an equivalent indoor locomotion analysis is not established yet. Technological development of inertial measurement units (IMU) broadens the possibilities for player monitoring and enables the quantification of locomotor movements in indoor environments. The aim of the current study was to validate an IMU measuring by determining average and peak human acceleration under indoor conditions in team sport specific movements. Data of a single wearable tracking device including an IMU (Optimeye 55, Catapult Sports, Melbourne, Australia) were compared to the results of a 3D motion analysis (MA) system (Vicon Motion Systems, Oxford, UK) during selected standardized movement simulations in an indoor laboratory (n = 56). A low-pass filtering method for gravity correction (LF) and two sensor fusion algorithms for orientation estimation [Complementary Filter (CF), Kalman-Filter (KF)] were implemented and compared with MA system data. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between LF and MA data but not between sensor fusion algorithms and MA. Higher precision and lower relative errors were found for CF (RMSE = 0.05; CV = 2.6%) and KF (RMSE = 0.15: CV = 3.8%) both compared to the LF method (RMSE = 1.14; CV = 47.6%) regarding the magnitude of the resulting vector and strongly emphasize the implementation of orientation estimation to accurately describe human acceleration. Comparing both sensor fusion algorithms, CF revealed slightly lower errors than KF and additionally provided valuable information about positive and negative acceleration values in all three movement planes with moderate to good validity (CV = 3.9 17.8%). Compared to x- and y-axis superior results were found for the z-axis. These findings demonstrate that IMU-based wearable tracking devices can successfully be applied for athlete monitoring in indoor team sports and provide potential to accurately quantify accelerations and decelerations in all three orthogonal axes with acceptable validity. An increase in accuracy taking magnetometers in account should be specifically pursued by future research.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   The acceleration dependent validity and reliability of 10 Hz GPS [J].
Akenhead, Richard ;
French, Duncan ;
Thompson, Kevin G. ;
Hayes, Philip R. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2014, 17 (05) :562-566
[2]   Diminutions of acceleration and deceleration output during professional football match play [J].
Akenhead, Richard ;
Hayes, Philip R. ;
Thompson, Kevin G. ;
French, Duncan .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2013, 16 (06) :556-561
[3]   VALIDITY OF A WEARABLE ACCELEROMETER DEVICE TO MEASURE AVERAGE ACCELERATION VALUES DURING HIGH-SPEED RUNNING [J].
Alexander, Jeremy P. ;
Hopkinson, Trent L. ;
Wundersitz, Daniel W. T. ;
Serpell, Benjamin G. ;
Mara, Jocelyn K. ;
Ball, Nick B. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2016, 30 (11) :3007-3013
[4]  
[Anonymous], INFORM FUSION CONSID
[5]  
[Anonymous], NEW VIEW STAT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ESSENTIALS POSITIONI
[7]   Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Nevill, AM .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) :217-238
[8]  
Bachmann E.R., 2001, PROC ACM S VIRTUAL R, P9, DOI [10.1145/505009.505011, DOI 10.1145/505008.505011]
[9]  
BARNSTON AG, 1992, WEATHER FORECAST, V7, P699, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1992)007<0699:CATCRA>2.0.CO
[10]  
2