Consumer direction in managed long-term care: An exploratory survey of practices and perceptions

被引:5
|
作者
Meiners, MR
Mahoney, KJ
Shoop, DM
Squillace, MR
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Aging, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Boston Coll, Grad Sch Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[3] Natl Council Aging, Res & Demonstrat Div, Washington, DC USA
来源
GERONTOLOGIST | 2002年 / 42卷 / 01期
关键词
long-term care; personal assistance services; consumer choice; consumer satisfaction; HMO;
D O I
10.1093/geront/42.1.32
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: This article presents results of a survey of the attitudes and practices of managed care organizations (MCOs) concerning consumer direction. The study focused on understanding several alternative measures of consumer direction and the factors that are associated with the MCOs concerning those measures. Design and Methods: The MCOs that were surveyed provided capitated managed long-term care benefits to their Medicaid-eligible clients and were chosen because personal assistance service is a likely area for consumer-direction interest or practice. Results: Although the majority of the responding MCOs were found to be practicing some form of consumer direction, the experience is limited and underdeveloped. Two areas of concern seem to be most important in an organization's decision to adopt a consumer choice or consumer-direction model: the balance of concerns about unprofitability and the perceived interest and benefit of the clients. Implications: This study suggests managed care and consumer direction can work together and provides a baseline to assess further development of their compatibility.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Telling the Story: Perceptions of Hospice in Long-Term Care
    Munn, Jean Correll
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 29 (03): : 201 - 209
  • [42] Knowledge and perceptions of the population on services in case of need for long-term care: A standardized telephone survey
    Schaal, Tom
    Schneiderat, Gotz
    Rentzsch, Katrin
    Geithner, Silke
    PFLEGE, 2022, 35 (04): : 243 - 251
  • [43] Measuring client experiences in long-term care in the Netherlands: a pilot study with the Consumer Quality Index Long-term Care
    Triemstra, Mattanja
    Winters, Sjenny
    Kool, Rudolf B.
    Wiegers, Therese A.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
  • [44] Measuring client experiences in long-term care in the Netherlands: a pilot study with the Consumer Quality Index Long-term Care
    Mattanja Triemstra
    Sjenny Winters
    Rudolf B Kool
    Therese A Wiegers
    BMC Health Services Research, 10
  • [45] Geriatric nurse practitioners in long-term care: Demonstration of effectiveness in managed care
    Burl, JB
    Bonner, A
    Rao, M
    Khan, AM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1998, 46 (04) : 506 - 510
  • [46] An Exploratory Factor Analysis for Developing and Validating a Scale of Long-Term Care Competencies among Care Managers in Long-Term Care System
    Somkamlang, Nattra
    Kitreerawutiwong, Nithra
    Thongkhamcharoen, Rojanasak
    SIMIOLUS-NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY FOR THE HISTORY OF ART, 2022, 44 (1-2) : 1135 - 1146
  • [47] 44 CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE DYSPHAGIA PREVALENCE AND PRACTICES IN RESIDENTIAL LONG-TERM CARE SETTINGS SURVEY
    Artiles, C. E.
    Regan, J.
    Donnellan, C.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2022, 51 (SUPP 3)
  • [48] The Impact of Consumer Numeracy on the Purchase of Long-Term Care Insurance
    McGarry, Brian E.
    Temkin-Greener, Helena
    Chapman, Benjamin P.
    Grabowski, David C.
    Li, Yue
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 51 (04) : 1612 - 1631
  • [49] Substance Abuse Policies in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Survey with Implications for Education of Long-Term Care Providers
    White, John B.
    Duncan, David F.
    Bradley, Dana Burr
    Nicholson, Thomas
    Bonaguro, John
    Abrahamson, Kathleen
    EDUCATIONAL GERONTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (07) : 519 - 526
  • [50] Taking time to care: best practices in long-term care communications
    Meath, Michael
    CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 11 (04) : 336 - +