Sperm competition roles and ejaculate investment in a promiscuous mammal

被引:24
|
作者
Lemaitre, J. -F. [1 ]
Ramm, S. A. [1 ]
Hurst, J. L. [1 ]
Stockley, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Integrat Biol, Mammalian Behav & Evolut Grp, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Neston CH64 7TE, England
关键词
bank vole; copulatory behaviour; copulatory plug; Myodes glareolus; sexual selection; social dominance; sperm allocation; sperm velocity; MALE BANK VOLES; CLETHRIONOMYS-GLAREOLUS; EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RELATIVE INVESTMENT; COPULATORY-BEHAVIOR; FEMALE CHOICE; SEMINAL FLUID; SOCIAL-STATUS; MALE RANK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02511.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Theoretical models of sperm competition predict how males should allocate sperm and seminal fluid components to ejaculates according to their mating role (dominant vs. subordinate). Here, we present a detailed analysis of ejaculate expenditure according to male roles in the bank vole (Myodes glareolus). Sperm competition occurs regularly in this species, and dominant males typically achieve higher fertilization success than subordinates. Contrary to theoretical predictions, we found that dominant male bank voles invest more sperm per ejaculate than subordinates, both absolutely and relative to body and testes mass. The testes of dominant males were also absolutely (although not relatively) larger than those of subordinates. However, we found no evidence that subordinate males compensate for lower sperm numbers per ejaculate by increasing ejaculation frequency or sperm velocity. Similarly, we found no evidence for differential investment in copulatory plug size according to male roles in sperm competition, although dominant males had significantly larger seminal vesicles (both absolutely and relative to body mass) compared with subordinates. We conclude that sperm competition roles can have significant but unexpected influences on ejaculate investment in mammals with clearly defined differences in male social status.
引用
收藏
页码:1216 / 1225
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sperm competition, mating rate and the evolution of testis and ejaculate sizes: a population model
    Parker, GA
    Ball, MA
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 1 (02) : 235 - 238
  • [32] Female sperm use and storage between fertilization events drive sperm competition and male ejaculate allocation
    Requena, Gustavo S.
    Alonzo, Suzanne H.
    EVOLUTION, 2014, 68 (12) : 3433 - 3444
  • [33] EJACULATE QUALITY AND CONSTRAINTS IN RELATION TO SPERM COMPETITION LEVELS AMONG EUTHERIAN MAMMALS
    Luepold, Stefan
    EVOLUTION, 2013, 67 (10) : 3052 - 3060
  • [34] Level of sperm competition promotes evolution of male ejaculate allocation patterns in a moth
    Ingleby, Fiona C.
    Lewis, Zenobia
    Wedell, Nina
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 80 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [35] Sperm Competition in Humans: Mate Guarding Behavior Negatively Correlates with Ejaculate Quality
    Leivers, Samantha
    Rhodes, Gillian
    Simmons, Leigh W.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [36] On sperm competition games: raffles and roles revisited
    Michael Mesterton-Gibbons
    Journal of Mathematical Biology, 1999, 39 : 91 - 108
  • [37] Delineating the roles of males and females in sperm competition
    Evans, Jonathan P.
    Rosengrave, Patrice
    Gasparini, Clelia
    Gemmell, Neil J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 280 (1772)
  • [38] On sperm competition games: raffles and roles revisited
    Mesterton-Gibbons, M
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 39 (02) : 91 - 108
  • [39] Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success
    Preston, BT
    Stevenson, IR
    Pemberton, JM
    Coltman, DW
    Wilson, K
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1515) : 633 - 640
  • [40] Rival Male Relatedness Does Not Affect Ejaculate Allocation as Predicted by Sperm Competition Theory
    Thomas, Melissa L.
    Simmons, Leigh W.
    PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (05):