Predictors of Adherence to Cancer-Related mHealth Apps in Cancer Patients Undergoing Oncological or Follow-Up Treatment-A Scoping Review

被引:6
|
作者
Armbruster, Christoph [1 ]
Knaub, Marie [1 ]
Farin-Glattacker, Erik [1 ]
von der Warth, Rieka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Fac Med, Sect Hlth Care Res & Rehabil Res SEVERA, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
mHealth; usage; adherence; influencing predictors; cancer patients; DEPRESSION; INTERVENTION; ACCEPTANCE; BARRIERS; VALIDITY; THERAPY; STATE; PAIN; CARE;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192013689
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
mHealth interventions in cancer care are being increasingly applied in various settings. Nevertheless, there is a phenomenon wherein individuals show different usage patterns, which could affect the effectiveness of the intervention. In general, it is important to know the predictors of app adherence and usage patterns to improve the design and content (i.e., tailoring). The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of predictors of adherence to cancer-related mHealth apps in cancer patients. A systematic literature search was conducted in March 2021 in the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO without limitation in year, focusing on cancer patients undergoing oncological or follow-up treatment using mHealth apps. The initial database search yielded a total of N = 8035 records. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, 10 articles met inclusion criteria. Studies were published between 2013 and 2020. Studies focused on children and adolescents (2/10) as well as adults (8/10). The predictors identified could be categorized into sociodemographic variables, cancer-related factors and others. This study provides an initial insight into relevant predictors of app adherence in cancer patients. However, no clear predictor of increased app adherence was found. Further research of usage patterns is therefore needed so that mHealth interventions can be tailored during development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies after cancer treatment: a systematic literature review
    Barbieri, M.
    Richardson, G.
    Paisley, S.
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2018, 126 (01) : 85 - 100
  • [32] Predictors of conversion surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant or palliative FOLFIRINOX treatment using baseline and follow-up CT
    Park, Sae-Jin
    Kim, Jung Hoon
    Joo, Ijin
    Han, Joon Koo
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (10) : 4765 - 4778
  • [33] The Impact of Hispanic Ethnicity and Language on Communication Among Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors, Parents, and Medical Providers and Cancer-Related Follow-Up Care
    Ochoa, Carol Y.
    Cho, Junhan
    Miller, Kimberly A.
    Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes
    Chan, Randall Y.
    Farias, Albert J.
    Milam, Joel E.
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (05) : 401 - E796
  • [34] The safety and acceptability of using telehealth for follow-up of patients following cancer surgery: A systematic review
    Xiao, Karren
    Yeung, Jonathan C.
    Bolger, Jarlath C.
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (01): : 9 - 15
  • [35] The Effect of Educational Follow-Up with the Motivational Interview Technique on Self-Efficacy and Drug Adherence in Cancer Patients Using Oral Chemotherapy Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cakmak, Huri Seval Gonderen
    Kapucu, Sevgisun
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2021, 37 (02)
  • [36] Evaluation of follow-up strategies for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment
    Clarke, Tilean
    Galaal, Khadra
    Bryant, Andrew
    Naik, Raj
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (09):
  • [37] Lymphedema, shoulder range of motion, pain, and presence of cords in patients undergoing breast cancer treatment with axillary web syndrome: Late follow-up
    Figueira, Patricia V.
    Haddad, Cinira
    Rizzi, Samantha K. Lopes de Almeida
    Estevao, Amanda
    Elias, Simone
    Facina, Gil
    Nazario, Afonso
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [38] Prognosis, clinicopathological characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients with ER-intermediate-positive breast cancer undergoing long-term follow-up
    Matsumoto, N.
    Wanifuchi-Endo, Y.
    Fujita, T.
    Asano, T.
    Terada, M.
    Nozawa, K.
    Mori, M.
    Isogai, A.
    Niwa, Y.
    Kato, H.
    Komura, M.
    Toyama, T.
    ESMO OPEN, 2025, 10 (04)
  • [39] Follow-up strategies after trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review
    Kaufmann, Ernest
    Aeppli, Stefanie
    Arnold, Winfried
    Balermpas, Panagiotis
    Beyer, Joerg
    Bieri, Uwe
    Cathomas, Richard
    de Bari, Berardino
    Dressler, Marco
    Engeler, Daniel S.
    Erdmann, Andreas
    Gallina, Andrea
    Gomez, Silvia
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Hermanns, Thomas
    Ilaria, Lucca
    John, Hubert
    Kessler, Thomas M.
    Klein, Jan
    Laouiti, Mohamed
    Lauffer, David
    Mattei, Agostino
    Muntener, Michael
    Nguyen, Daniel
    Niederberger, Philipp
    Papachristofilou, Alexandros
    Prause, Lukas
    Reinhardt, Karsten
    Salati, Emanuela
    Sebe, Philippe
    Shelan, Mohamed
    Strebel, Raeto
    Templeton, Arnoud J.
    Vogl, Ursula
    Wettstein, Marian S.
    Zihler, Deborah
    Zilli, Thomas
    Zwahlen, Daniel
    Roth, Beat
    Fankhauser, Christian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [40] Four-year follow-up on fatigue and sleep quality of a three-armed partly randomized controlled study in breast cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue
    Kroez, M.
    Quittel, F.
    Reif, M.
    Zerm, R.
    Pranga, D.
    Bartsch, C.
    Brinkhaus, B.
    Buessing, A.
    Gutenbrunner, C.
    ten Brink, Fadime
    Berger, Bettina
    Weninger, Annette
    Girke, Matthias
    Mueller-Glinz, Augustina
    Heckmann, Christian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)