Evaluation of Human Factors for Assessing Human-Robot Interaction in Delayed Teleoperation

被引:4
|
作者
Wojtusch, Janis [1 ]
Taubert, Daniela [2 ]
Graber, Thorsten [3 ]
Nergaard, Kim [1 ]
机构
[1] European Space Technol Ctr, Studies & Special Projects Div, Darmstadt, Germany
[2] LSE Space GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
[3] Solenix Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
来源
2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC) | 2018年
关键词
human-robot interaction; telerobotics; human factors; delay effects; space technology;
D O I
10.1109/SMC.2018.00641
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In space missions, the interaction of human operators and telerobotic systems facilitates complex exploration and manipulation tasks but is substantially affected by inevitable time delays. The efficiency and effectiveness of the human-robot interaction strongly depends on several not immediately obvious human factors. The actual degree of influence and possible interactions among these human factors are still subject of ongoing research. This paper presents the results of the dHRI Expert Survey which aimed at a systematic evaluation of relevant human factors for teleoperation scenarios with critical time delays. The survey focused on different aspects of situational awareness, user workload and user experience for an example scenario with a teleoperated robotic system on the Moon and a human operator on Earth. Twenty-eight international experts in human-robot interaction, robotics and engineering participated in the survey. The results provide a valuable indication of significance for the regarded factors with understanding, performance and dependability being rated as most important. Even there are commonly accepted definitions, large deviations in the ratings for some factors and additional comments by some experts suggest that there still might be an ambiguity in the use of terms.
引用
收藏
页码:3787 / 3792
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual and Manual Control for Human-Robot Teleoperation
    Duenser, Andreas
    Lochner, Martin
    Engelke, Ulrich
    Rozado Fernandez, David
    IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, 35 (03) : 20 - 30
  • [2] Human-Robot Interaction Based on Gaze Gestures for the Drone Teleoperation
    Yu, Mingxin
    Lin, Yingzi
    Schmidt, David
    Wang, Xiangzhou
    Wang, Yu
    JOURNAL OF EYE MOVEMENT RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (04):
  • [3] Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics
    Murphy, RR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2004, 34 (02): : 138 - 153
  • [4] Perception and Evaluation in Human-Robot Interaction: The Human-Robot Interaction Evaluation Scale (HRIES)-A Multicomponent Approach of Anthropomorphism
    Spatola, Nicolas
    Kuhnlenz, Barbara
    Cheng, Gordon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2021, 13 (07) : 1517 - 1539
  • [5] Evaluation of Robot Emotion Expressions for Human-Robot Interaction
    Cardenas, Pedro
    Garcia, Jose
    Begazo, Rolinson
    Aguilera, Ana
    Dongo, Irvin
    Cardinale, Yudith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2024, : 2019 - 2041
  • [6] Editorial: Human factors and cognitive ergonomics in advanced industrial human-robot interaction
    Billing, Erik
    Fraboni, Federico
    Gualtieri, Luca
    Rosen, Patricia Helen
    Thorvald, Peter
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2025, 12
  • [7] Human-Robot Interaction in Health Care: Focus on Human Factors
    Kremer, Lisanne
    Sen, Sumona
    Eigenstetter, Monika
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. MULTIMODAL AND NATURAL INTERACTION, HCI 2020, PT II, 2020, 12182 : 654 - 667
  • [8] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy R.R.
    Nomura T.
    Billard A.
    Burke J.L.
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02) : 85 - 89
  • [9] Simplified Human-Robot Interaction: Modeling and Evaluation
    Daniel, Balazs
    Thomessen, Trygve
    Korondi, Peter
    MODELING IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL, 2013, 34 (04) : 199 - 211
  • [10] Human-robot interaction
    Kosuge, K
    Hirata, Y
    IEEE ROBIO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS, 2004, : 8 - 11