Peer Support Interventions for Adults With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Hemoglobin A1c Outcomes

被引:56
作者
Patil, Sonal J. [1 ]
Ruppar, Todd [2 ]
Koopman, Richelle J. [1 ]
Lindbloom, Erik J. [1 ]
Elliott, Susan G. [1 ]
Mehr, David R. [1 ]
Conn, Vicki S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Family & Community Med, Columbia, MO USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Sinclair Sch Nursing, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
peer support; support groups; diabetes mellitus; glycemic control; hemoglobin A(1c); self-efficacy; SELF-MANAGEMENT EDUCATION; LOW-INCOME PATIENTS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; CARE; PROGRAMS; COACHES; PEOPLE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1370/afm.1982
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Peer support intervention trials have shown varying effects on glycemic control. We aimed to estimate the effect of peer support interventions delivered by people affected by diabetes (those with the disease or a caregiver) on hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels in adults. METHODS We searched multiple databases from 1960 to November 2015, including Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Scopus. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with diabetes receiving peer support interventions compared with otherwise similar care. Seventeen of 205 retrieved studies were eligible for inclusion. Quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) of change in HbA(1c) level from baseline between groups using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were predefined. RESULTS Seventeen studies (3 cluster RCTs, 14 RCTs) with 4,715 participants showed an improvement in pooled HbA(1c) level with an SMD of 0.121 (95% CI, 0.026-0.217; P =.01; I-2 = 60.66%) in the peer support intervention group compared with the control group; this difference translated to an improvement in HbA(1c) level of 0.24% (95% CI, 0.05%-0.43%). Peer support interventions showed an HbA(1c) improvement of 0.48% (95% CI, 0.25%-0.70%; P < .001; I-2 = 17.12%) in the subset of studies with predominantly Hispanic participants and 0.53% (95% CI, 0.32%-0.73%; P < .001; I-2 = 9.24%) in the subset of studies with predominantly minority participants; both were clinically relevant. In sensitivity analysis excluding cluster RCTs, the overall effect size changed little. CONCLUSIONS Peer support interventions for diabetes overall achieved a statistically significant but minor improvement in HbA(1c) levels. These interventions may, however, be particularly effective in improving glycemic control for people from minority groups, especially those of Hispanic ethnicity.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 551
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Culturally appropriate health education for people in ethnic minority groups with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Attridge, Madeleine
    Creamer, John
    Ramsden, Michael
    Cannings-John, Rebecca
    Hawthorne, Kamila
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (09):
  • [2] Puentes hacia una mejor vida (Bridges to a Better Life): Outcome of a Diabetes Control Peer Support Intervention
    Ayala, Guadalupe X.
    Ibarra, Leticia
    Cherrington, Andrea L.
    Parada, Humberto
    Horton, Lucy
    Ji, Ming
    Elder, John P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 13 : S9 - S17
  • [3] Baghianimoghadam M H, 2012, Rom J Intern Med, V50, P165
  • [4] Peer advisers compared with specialist health professionals in delivering a training programme on self-management to people with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
    Baksi, A. K.
    Al-Mrayat, M.
    Hogan, D.
    Whittingstall, E.
    Wilson, P.
    Wex, J.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2008, 25 (09) : 1076 - 1082
  • [5] Can peer educators influence healthy eating in people with diabetes? Results of a randomized controlled trial
    Cade, J. E.
    Kirk, S. F. L.
    Nelson, P.
    Hollins, L.
    Deakin, T.
    Greenwood, D. C.
    Harvey, E. L.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (10) : 1048 - 1054
  • [6] Effects of Telephone-Based Peer Support in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Integrated Care A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Chan, Juliana C. N.
    Sui, Yi
    Oldenburg, Brian
    Zhang, Yuying
    Chung, Harriet H. Y.
    Goggins, William
    Au, Shimen
    Brown, Nicola
    Ozaki, Risa
    Wong, Rebecca Y. M.
    Ko, Gary T. C.
    Fisher, Ed
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (06) : 972 - 981
  • [7] Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions (Review)
    Coulter, Angela
    Entwistle, Vikki A.
    Eccles, Abi
    Ryan, Sara
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Perera, Rafael
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (03):
  • [8] What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review
    Dale, J. R.
    Williams, S. M.
    Bowyer, V.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2012, 29 (11) : 1361 - 1377
  • [9] Telephone peer-delivered intervention for diabetes motivation and support: The telecare exploratory RCT
    Dale, Jeremy
    Caramlau, Isabela
    Sturt, Jackie
    Friede, Tim
    Walker, Rosemary
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 75 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [10] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188