Assessment of flood susceptible areas using spatially explicit, probabilistic multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:79
作者
Tang, Zhongqian [1 ]
Zhang, Hua [2 ]
Yi, Shanzhen [1 ]
Xiao, Yangfan [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hydropower & Informat Engn, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flood; Multi-criteria decision analysis; GIS; Monte Carlo analytic hierarchy process; Local ordered weighted averaging; Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; GIS; MODEL; FRAMEWORK; WEIGHT; INDEX; MANAGEMENT; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.033
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is increasingly used to support flood risk assessment. However, conventional GIS-MCDA methods fail to adequately represent spatial variability and are accompanied with considerable uncertainty. It is, thus, important to incorporate spatial variability and uncertainty into GIS-based decision analysis procedures. This research develops a spatially explicit, probabilistic GIS-MCDA approach for the delineation of potentially flood susceptible areas. The approach integrates the probabilistic and the local ordered weighted averaging (OWA) methods via Monte Carlo simulation, to take into account the uncertainty related to criteria weights, spatial heterogeneity of preferences and the risk attitude of the analyst. The approach is applied to a pilot study for the Gucheng County central China, heavily affected by the hazardous 2012 flood. A GIS database of six geomorphological and hydrometeorological factors for the evaluation of susceptibility was created. Moreover, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis were performed to investigate the robustness of the model. The results indicate that the ensemble method improves the robustness of the model outcomes with respect to variation in criteria weights and identifies which criteria weights are most responsible for the variability of model outcomes. Therefore, the proposed. approach is an improvement over the conventional deterministic method and can provides a more rational, objective and unbiased tool for flood susceptibility evaluation. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 158
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods [J].
Khosravi, Khabat ;
Shahabi, Himan ;
Binh Thai Pham ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Shirzadi, Ataollah ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Dou, Jie ;
Ly, Hai-Bang ;
Grof, Gyula ;
Huu Loc Ho ;
Hong, Haoyuan ;
Chapi, Kamran ;
Prakash, Indra .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 573 :311-323
[42]   Scenario analysis of flood control structures using a multi-criteria decision-making technique in Northeast Iran [J].
Mostafazadeh, Raoof ;
Sadoddin, Amir ;
Bahremand, Abdolreza ;
Sheikh, Vahed Berdi ;
Garizi, Arash Zare .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2017, 87 (03) :1827-1846
[43]   Flood susceptibility mapping using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis: A case of Dodoma region, central Tanzania [J].
Msabi, Michael M. ;
Makonyo, Michael .
REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 21
[44]   Multi-species duck harvesting using dynamic programming and multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Johnson, Fred A. ;
Zimmerman, Guthrie S. ;
Huang, Min T. ;
Padding, Paul I. ;
Balkcom, Gregory D. ;
Runge, Michael C. ;
Devers, Patrick K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (06) :1447-1459
[45]   Evaluating urban flood hazard index (UFHI) of Dehradun city using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Bansal, Neha ;
Mukherjee, Mahua ;
Gairola, Ajay .
MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (03) :4051-4064
[46]   Mapping Greater Bandung flood susceptibility based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) using AHP method [J].
Agustina, Rena Denya ;
Putra, Riki Purnama ;
Susanti, Seni .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 82 (15)
[47]   Evaluating urban flood hazard index (UFHI) of Dehradun city using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Neha Bansal ;
Mahua Mukherjee ;
Ajay Gairola .
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2022, 8 :4051-4064
[48]   Flood susceptible surface detection using geospatial multi-criteria framework for management practices [J].
Paul, Pranay ;
Sarkar, Rumki .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 114 (03) :3015-3041
[49]   Assessment of recharge capacity potential of groundwater using comparative multi-criteria decision analysis approaches [J].
Minea, Ionut ;
Boicu, Daniel ;
Chelariu, Oana-Elena ;
Iosub, Marina ;
Enea, Andrei .
JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 32 (04) :735-756
[50]   Residents' perception of flood risk and urban stream restoration using multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Hong, Chang-Yu ;
Chang, Heejun .
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 36 (10) :2078-2088