Health-Related Quality of Life Changes Associated With Hearing Loss

被引:60
作者
Dixon, Peter R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feeny, David [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Tomlinson, George [2 ,3 ]
Cushing, Sharon [1 ,7 ]
Chen, Joseph M. [1 ,8 ]
Krahn, Murray D. [2 ,3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Six Queens Pk Crescent,Ste 120, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Toronto Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment Collaborat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Econ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Hlth Util Inc, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Hlth Network, Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS; COST-UTILITY; DEAFENED ADULTS; EXPERIENCES; INSTRUMENT; SELF; PERSPECTIVE; ADVANTAGES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0674
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Importance Utility is a single-value, preference-based measure of health-related quality of life that represents the desirability of a health state relative to being dead or in perfect health. Clinical, funding, and policy decisions rely on measured changes in utility. The benefit of hearing loss treatments may be underestimated because existing utility measures fail to capture important changes in quality of life associated with hearing loss. Objective To develop a comprehensive profile of items that describe how quality of life is associated with hearing loss and its treatments that can be used to generate hearing-related quality of life measures, including a novel utility measure. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study, performed from August 1, 2018, to August 1, 2019, in tertiary referral centers, comprised a systematic literature review, focus groups, and semistructured interviews. The systematic review evaluated studies published from 1982 to August 1, 2018. Focus groups included 8 clinical experts experienced in the measurement, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of hearing loss. Semistructured interviews included 26 adults with hearing loss recruited from an institutional data set and outpatient hearing aid and otology clinics using stratified convenience sampling to include individuals of diverse ages, urban and rural residency, causes of hearing loss, severity of hearing loss, and treatment experience. Main Outcomes and Measures A set of items and subdomains that collectively describe the association of hearing loss with health-related quality of life. Results The literature search yielded 2779 articles from the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. Forty-five studies including 1036 individuals (age range, 18-84 years) were included. The focus group included 4 audiologists and 4 otologists. Hour-long semistructured interviews were conducted with 26 individuals (13 women; median age, 54 years; range, 25-83 years) with a broad range of hearing loss causes, configurations, and severities. From all 3 sources, a total of 125 items were generated and organized into 29 subdomains derived from the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Conclusions and Relevance The association of hearing loss with quality of life is multidimensional and includes subdomains that are not considered in the estimation of health utility by existing utility measures. The presented comprehensive profile of items can be used to generate or evaluate measures of hearing-related quality of life, including utility measures. Question What changes in health-related quality of life are associated with hearing loss? Findings In this qualitative study, a systematic literature review of 45 studies including 1036 patients with hearing loss, an expert focus group of 4 audiologists and 4 otologists, and semistructured interviews with 26 individuals with hearing loss were used to identify a comprehensive list of the 29 subdomains of quality of life associated with hearing loss. Meaning Understanding the multifaceted associations of hearing loss with health-related quality of life is essential to studying hearing loss conditions and treatments; the framework presented here is useful for generation or evaluation of hearing-related quality of life measures. This qualitative study develops a comprehensive profile of items that describe how quality of life is associated with hearing loss and its treatments that can be used to generate hearing-related quality of life measures, including a novel utility measure.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 638
页数:9
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Bringing the (disabled) body to personality psychology: A case study of Samantha [J].
Adler, Jonathan M. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2018, 86 (05) :803-824
[2]   The experience of deafened adults: Implications for rehabilitative services [J].
Aguayo, MO ;
Coady, NF .
HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2001, 26 (04) :269-276
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Lancet
[4]   Quality of Life in Cochlear Implantees: Comparing Utility Values Obtained Through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3 [J].
Arnoldner, Christoph ;
Lin, Vincent Y. ;
Bresler, Richard ;
Kaider, Alexandra ;
Kuthubutheen, Jafri ;
Shipp, David ;
Chen, Joseph M. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (11) :2586-2590
[5]  
Bai Z., 2005, Audiol Med, V3, P212, DOI [DOI 10.1080/16513860500474476, 10.1080/16513860500474476]
[6]  
Bartel Lee R, 2011, Cochlear Implants Int, V12, P27, DOI 10.1179/146701010X486435
[7]  
Boswell S., 2003, ASHA Lead, V8, P14
[8]  
Buhagiar R, 2011, Cochlear Implants Int, V12 Suppl 2, pS44, DOI 10.1179/146701011X13074645127559
[9]   Cost-Utility Analysis of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Health Economic Assessment From the Perspective of a Publicly Funded Program [J].
Chen, Joseph M. ;
Amoodi, Hossam ;
Mittmann, Nicole .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (06) :1452-1458
[10]   Finding Qualitative Research Evidence for Health Technology Assessment [J].
DeJean, Deirdre ;
Giacomini, Mita ;
Simeonov, Dorina ;
Smith, Andrea .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (10) :1307-1317