Interactions of local habitat type, landscape composition and flower availability moderate wild bee communities

被引:28
|
作者
Neumueller, Ulrich [1 ]
Burger, Hannah [1 ]
Krausch, Sabrina [1 ]
Bluethgen, Nico [2 ]
Ayasse, Manfred [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Evolutionary Ecol & Conservat Genom, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Biol, Ecol Networks, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
Wild bee; Landscape composition; Grassland; Pollination; Flower planting; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; NESTING RESOURCES; SPECIES RICHNESS; FLORAL RESOURCES; R PACKAGE; DIVERSITY; POLLINATION; CONSERVATION; ABUNDANCE; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-020-01096-4
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Landscape and local habitat traits moderate wild bee communities. However, whether landscape effects differ between local habitat types is largely unknown. Objectives We explored the way that wild bee communities in three distinct habitats are shaped by landscape composition and the availability of flowering plants by evaluating divergences in response patterns between habitats. Methods In a large-scale monitoring project across 20 research areas, wild bee data were collected on three habitats: near-natural grassland, established flower plantings and residual habitats (e.g. field margins). Additionally, landscape composition was mapped around the research areas. Results Our monitoring produced a dataset of 27,650 bees belonging to 324 species. Bee communities on all three habitats reacted similarly to local flower availability. Intensively managed grassland in the surrounding landscape had an overall negative effect on the studied habitats. Other landscape variables produced diverging response patterns that were particularly pronounced during early and late season. Bee communities in near-natural grassland showed a strong positive response to ruderal areas. Flower plantings and residual habitats such as field margins showed a pronounced positive response to extensively managed grassland and woodland edges. Response patterns regarding bee abundance were consistent with those found for species richness. Conclusion We advise the consideration of local habitat type and seasonality when assessing the effect of landscape context on bee communities. A reduction in the intensity of grassland management enhances bee diversity in a broad range of habitats. Moreover, wild bee communities are promoted by habitat types such as ruderal areas or woodland edges.
引用
收藏
页码:2209 / 2224
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Habitat quality and surrounding landscape structures influence wild bee occurrence in perennial wildflower strips
    Schubert, Lea F.
    Hellwig, Niels
    Kirmer, Anita
    Schmid-Egger, Christian
    Schmidt, Annika
    Dieker, Petra
    Tischew, Sabine
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, 60 : 76 - 86
  • [42] Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops
    Carre, Gabriel
    Roche, Philip
    Chifflet, Remy
    Morison, Nicolas
    Bommarco, Riccardo
    Harrison-Cripps, Jenn
    Krewenka, Kristin
    Potts, Simon G.
    Roberts, Stuart P. M.
    Rodet, Guy
    Settele, Josef
    Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
    Szentgyorgyi, Hajnalka
    Tscheulin, Thomas
    Westphal, Catrin
    Woyciechowski, Michal
    Vaissiere, Bernard E.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 133 (1-2) : 40 - 47
  • [43] Relationships among ecological traits of wild bee communities along gradients of habitat amount and fragmentation
    Carrie, Romain
    Andrieu, Emilie
    Cunningham, Saul A.
    Lentini, Pia E.
    Loreau, Michel
    Ouin, Annie
    ECOGRAPHY, 2017, 40 (01) : 85 - 97
  • [44] A century of local changes in bumblebee communities and landscape composition in Belgium
    Vray, Sarah
    Rollin, Orianne
    Rasmont, Pierre
    Dufrene, Marc
    Michez, Denis
    Dendoncker, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2019, 23 (03) : 489 - 501
  • [45] A century of local changes in bumblebee communities and landscape composition in Belgium
    Sarah Vray
    Orianne Rollin
    Pierre Rasmont
    Marc Dufrêne
    Denis Michez
    Nicolas Dendoncker
    Journal of Insect Conservation, 2019, 23 : 489 - 501
  • [46] Wild bee diversity increases with local fire severity in a fire-prone landscape
    Galbraith, Sara M.
    Cane, James H.
    Moldenke, Andrew R.
    Rivers, James W.
    ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (04):
  • [47] Wild Bee Conservation within Urban Gardens and Nurseries: Effects of Local and Landscape Management
    Egerer, Monika
    Cecala, Jacob M.
    Cohen, Hamutahl
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [48] Local and landscape context affects bee communities in mixed fruit orchards in Southern Thailand
    Karnchananiyom, Suntaree
    Wayo, Kanuengnit
    Sritongchuay, Tuanjit
    Warrit, Natapot
    Attasopa, Korrawat
    Bumrungsri, Sara
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY, 2024, 26 (01) : 70 - 80
  • [49] Effects of habitat composition and landscape structure on worker foraging distances of five bumble bee species
    Redhead, John W.
    Dreier, Stephanie
    Bourke, Andrew F. G.
    Heard, Matthew S.
    Jordan, William C.
    Sumner, Seirian
    Wang, Jinliang
    Carvell, Claire
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (03) : 726 - 739
  • [50] Predicting landscape-scale native bumble bee habitat use over space, time, and forage availability
    Hemberger, Jeremy
    Williams, Neal
    ECOLOGY, 2025, 106 (02)