Tolerance Profile of the Proliferation Signal Inhibitors Everolimus and Sirolimus in Heart Transplantation

被引:27
作者
Moro, J. A.
Almenar, L.
Martinez-Dolz, L.
Sanchez-Lazaro, I.
Aguero, J.
Salvador, A.
机构
[1] HU La Fe, Res Fdn, Valencia, Spain
[2] HU La Fe, Heart Failure & Transplantat Dept, Valencia, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.09.049
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. The side effects of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) have been characterized as a class. However, it would be convenient to assess them according to the molecule. Objective. To assess prospectively the tolerance of PSIs among heart transplant (HT) patients. Patients and Methods. We studied 56 HT patients who sequentially received PSIs to either withdraw (77%) or reduce the dosage of a calcineurin inhibitor; 42 received everolimus (EVE) and 14 sirolimus (SRL). We analyzed the demographic variables, side effects, and need to withdraw the drug during a median follow-up period of 365 days. Results. No differences between groups were observed upon analysis of the clinical and demographic variables when the treatment was changed owing to renal dysfunction (67%) or tumor (32%). No difference between groups was observed over the follow-up period (P = .28). Infection was the most common side effect, 28.6%: EVE, 14.3% versus SRL, 71.4% (P < .0001). Edema occurred in 26.8% of patients: EVE, 14.3% versus SRL, 64.3% (P = .001); diarrhea in 5.4% of patients: EVE, 2.4% versus SRL, 14.3% (P = .15). Treatment was withdrawn in 23.2% of the patients due to intolerance: EVE, 11.9% versus SRL, 57.1% (P < .0001). EVE showed significantly better survival without edema or infections or used for drug withdrawal upon Kaplan-Meier analysis, (P = .01; P = .0005; P = .0097). Only SRL use was shown to be an independent predictor of side effects. Conclusion. Edema and infections are the main problems caused by PSIs. EVE may display a better tolerance profile than SRL.
引用
收藏
页码:3034 / 3036
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients [J].
Eisen, HJ ;
Tuzcu, EM ;
Dorent, R ;
Kobashigawa, J ;
Mancini, D ;
Valantine-von Kaeppler, HA ;
Starling, RC ;
Sorensen, K ;
Hummel, M ;
Lind, JM ;
Abeywickrama, KH ;
Bernhardt, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (09) :847-858
[2]   Drug therapy in the heart transplant recipient - Part II: Immunosuppressive drugs [J].
Lindenfeld, J ;
Miller, GG ;
Shakar, SF ;
Zolty, R ;
Lowes, BD ;
Wolfel, EE ;
Mestroni, L ;
Page, RL ;
Kobashigawa, J .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (25) :3858-3865
[3]   Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of rejection in de Novo renal transplant recipients: A 3-year randomized, multicenter, phase III study [J].
Lorber, MI ;
Mulgaonkar, S ;
Butt, KMH ;
Elkhammas, E ;
Mendez, R ;
Rajagopalan, PR ;
Kahan, B ;
Sollinger, H ;
Li, YL ;
Cretin, N ;
Tedesco, H .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (02) :244-252
[4]   Cutaneous adverse events in renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based therapy [J].
Mahé, E ;
Morelon, E ;
Lechaton, S ;
Sang, KHL ;
Mansouri, R ;
Ducasse, MF ;
Mamzer-Bruneel, MF ;
de Prost, Y ;
Kreis, H ;
Bodemer, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (04) :476-482
[5]   MTOR inhibitors and their secondary effects in cardiac trasplant recipients:: A descriptive study [J].
Moro, J. ;
Almenar, L. ;
Martinez-Dolz, L. ;
Izquierdo, M. ;
Rueda, J. ;
Arnau, M. A. ;
Aguero, J. ;
Sanchez-Lazaro, I. ;
Ortiz, V. ;
Salvador, A. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (07) :2365-2367
[6]   Clinical experience with everolimus (Certican):: Optimizing dose and tolerability [J].
Pascual, J ;
Marcén, R ;
Ortuño, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (09) :S80-S84
[7]   Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients [J].
Vitko, S ;
Margreiter, R ;
Weimar, W ;
Dantal, J ;
Viljoen, HG ;
Li, YL ;
Jappe, A ;
Cretin, N .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (10) :1532-1540
[8]   Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients [J].
Vítko, S ;
Margreiter, R ;
Weimar, W ;
Dantal, J ;
Kuypers, D ;
Winkler, M ;
Oyen, O ;
Viljoen, HG ;
Filiptsev, P ;
Sadek, S ;
Li, YL ;
Cretin, N ;
Budde, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (10) :2521-2530