Implant Stability Measurements of Two Immediate Loading Protocols for the Edentulous Mandible: Rigid and Semi-rigid Splinting of the Implants

被引:17
作者
Lee, Hyung Joo
de Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida [1 ]
Alcantara, Paola Rebelatto
Vieira, Rogeria Acedo [2 ]
Suzuki, Dalton
Kiatake Fontao, Flavia Gasparini [3 ]
Tiossi, Rodrigo [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] ILAPEO, Latin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ, Dept Prosthodont, BR-80710150 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] ILAPEO, Latin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ, Dept Implantol, BR-80710150 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] ILAPEO, Latin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ, Dept Radiol, BR-80710150 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Dent Sch Ribeirao Preto, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
edentulous jaw; implant-supported fixed prosthesis; immediate dental implant loading; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; BONE-DENSITY; INSERTION TORQUE; FIXED PROSTHESIS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; OVERDENTURES; CANTILEVER; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0b013e31826b1c68
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: Primary and secondary stabilities of immediately loaded mandibular implants restored with fixed prostheses (FP) using rigid or semirigid splinting systems were clinically and radiographically evaluated. Methods: Fifteen edentulous patients were rehabilitated using hybrid FP; each had 5 implants placed between the mental foramens. Two groups were randomly divided: group 1-FP with the conventional rigid bar splinting the implants and group 2-semi-rigid cantilever extension system with titanium bars placed in the 2 distal abutment cylinders. Primary stability was evaluated using resonance frequency analysis after installation of the implant abutments. The measurements were made at 3 times: T0, at baseline; T1, 4 months after implant placement; and T2, 8 months after implant placement. Presence of mobility and inflammation in the implant surrounding regions were checked. Stability data were submitted to statistical analysis for comparison between groups (P, 0.05). Results: Implant survival rate for the implants was of 100% in both groups. No significant differences in the mean implant stability quotient values were found for both groups from baseline and after the 8-month follow-up. Conclusion: The immediate loading of the implants was satisfactory, and both splinting conditions (rigid and semi-rigid) can be successfully used for the restoration of edentulous mandibles. (Implant Dent 2012;21:486-490)
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 490
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Prostheses Removal for Suture Removal after Immediate Load: Success of Implants
    Sanches Borges, Ana Flavia
    Violin Dias Pereira, Luis Antonio
    Thome, Geninho
    Moreira Melo, Ana Claudia
    de Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (03) : 244 - 248
  • [22] SCHNITMAN P A, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P96
  • [23] Schnitman P A, 1988, J Dent Educ, V52, P725
  • [24] Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications
    Sennerby, Lars
    Meredith, Neil
    [J]. PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2008, 47 : 51 - 66
  • [25] Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis
    Sertgoz, A
    Guvener, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, 76 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [26] SURVIVAL OF FIXED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES RELATED TO CANTILEVER LENGTHS
    SHACKLETON, JL
    CARR, L
    SLABBERT, JCG
    BECKER, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 71 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [27] BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN OSSEOINTEGRATED PROSTHESES
    SKALAK, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 49 (06) : 843 - 848
  • [28] Finite Element Analysis of 2 Immediate Loading Systems in Edentulous Mandible: Rigid and Semirigid Splinting of Implants
    Teixeira, Marcelo Fontes
    Ramalho, Saturnino Aparecido
    de Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida
    Lehmann, Roberto Brunow
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [29] Testori T, 2003, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V18, P544
  • [30] van Zyl P P, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P51