Energy Return on Investment for Algal Biofuel Production Coupled with Wastewater Treatment

被引:32
作者
Beal, Colin M. [1 ,2 ]
Stillwell, Ashlynn S. [3 ]
King, Carey W. [4 ,5 ]
Cohen, Stuart M. [2 ]
Berberoglu, Halil [2 ]
Bhattarai, Rajendra P. [6 ]
Connelly, Rhykka L. [1 ]
Webber, Michael E. [2 ,4 ]
Hebner, Robert E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Ctr Electromech, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Mech Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Ctr Int Energy & Environm Policy, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[6] City Austin, Austin Water Util Environm & Regulatory Serv Div, Austin, TX USA
关键词
wastewater treatment; algae; biofuel; algal biofuel production; biological nutrient removal; energy return on investment; energy balance; synergy; NET ENERGY; MICROALGAE; BIODIESEL; GAS; OIL; FLOCCULATION; CULTIVATION; EMISSIONS; FRAMEWORK; ETHANOL;
D O I
10.2175/106143012X13378023685718
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents a second-order energy return on investment analysis to evaluate the mutual benefits of combining an advanced wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) (with biological nutrient removal) with algal biofuel production. With conventional, independently operated systems, algae production requires significant material inputs, which require energy directly and indirectly, and the WWTP requires significant energy inputs for treatment of the waste streams. The second-order energy return on investment values for independent operation of the WWTP and the algal biofuels production facility were determined to be 0.37 and 0.42, respectively. By combining the two, energy inputs can be reduced significantly. Consequently, the integrated system can outperform the isolated system, yielding a second-order energy return on investment of 1.44. Combining these systems transforms two energy sinks to a collective (second-order) energy source. However, these results do not include capital, labor, and other required expenses, suggesting that profitable deployment will be challenging. Water Environ. Res., 84, 692 (2012).
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 710
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
[21]   Net energy from the extraction of oil and gas in the United States [J].
Cleveland, CJ .
ENERGY, 2005, 30 (05) :769-782
[22]   Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production [J].
Collet, Pierre ;
Helias, Arnaud ;
Lardon, Laurent ;
Ras, Monique ;
Goy, Romy-Alice ;
Steyer, Jean-Philippe .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) :207-214
[23]  
Connelly R., PULSED ELECT E UNPUB
[24]   Techno-economic analysis of autotrophic microalgae for fuel production [J].
Davis, Ryan ;
Aden, Andy ;
Pienkos, Philip T. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (10) :3524-3531
[25]   Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals [J].
Farrell, AE ;
Plevin, RJ ;
Turner, BT ;
Jones, AD ;
O'Hare, M ;
Kammen, DM .
SCIENCE, 2006, 311 (5760) :506-508
[26]   Evaluation of membrane bioreactor process capabilities to meet stringent effluent nutrient discharge requirements [J].
Fleischer, EJ ;
Broderick, TA ;
Daigger, GT ;
Fonseca, AD ;
Holbrook, RD ;
Murthy, SN .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2005, 77 (02) :162-178
[27]  
Goldstein R., 2002, 1006787 EPRI, V4
[28]  
Grima EM, 2003, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V20, P491
[29]   A New Long Term Assessment of Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for US Oil and Gas Discovery and Production [J].
Guilford, Megan C. ;
Hall, Charles A. S. ;
O' Connor, Pete ;
Cleveland, Cutler J. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (10) :1866-1887
[30]  
Hall C. A. S., 1984, ENERGY RESOURCE QUAL