Energy Return on Investment for Algal Biofuel Production Coupled with Wastewater Treatment

被引:32
作者
Beal, Colin M. [1 ,2 ]
Stillwell, Ashlynn S. [3 ]
King, Carey W. [4 ,5 ]
Cohen, Stuart M. [2 ]
Berberoglu, Halil [2 ]
Bhattarai, Rajendra P. [6 ]
Connelly, Rhykka L. [1 ]
Webber, Michael E. [2 ,4 ]
Hebner, Robert E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Ctr Electromech, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Mech Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Ctr Int Energy & Environm Policy, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[6] City Austin, Austin Water Util Environm & Regulatory Serv Div, Austin, TX USA
关键词
wastewater treatment; algae; biofuel; algal biofuel production; biological nutrient removal; energy return on investment; energy balance; synergy; NET ENERGY; MICROALGAE; BIODIESEL; GAS; OIL; FLOCCULATION; CULTIVATION; EMISSIONS; FRAMEWORK; ETHANOL;
D O I
10.2175/106143012X13378023685718
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents a second-order energy return on investment analysis to evaluate the mutual benefits of combining an advanced wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) (with biological nutrient removal) with algal biofuel production. With conventional, independently operated systems, algae production requires significant material inputs, which require energy directly and indirectly, and the WWTP requires significant energy inputs for treatment of the waste streams. The second-order energy return on investment values for independent operation of the WWTP and the algal biofuels production facility were determined to be 0.37 and 0.42, respectively. By combining the two, energy inputs can be reduced significantly. Consequently, the integrated system can outperform the isolated system, yielding a second-order energy return on investment of 1.44. Combining these systems transforms two energy sinks to a collective (second-order) energy source. However, these results do not include capital, labor, and other required expenses, suggesting that profitable deployment will be challenging. Water Environ. Res., 84, 692 (2012).
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 710
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Review on biofuel oil and gas production processes from microalgae [J].
Amin, Sarmidi .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (07) :1834-1840
[2]  
[Anonymous], AMBIO J HUMAN ENV
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOENERGY RES
[4]  
[Anonymous], ERR25 USDA EC RES SE
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Energy in nature and society: General energetics of complex systems
[7]   Domestic water use in the United States - A life-cycle approach [J].
Arpke, A ;
Hutzler, N .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 10 (1-2) :169-184
[8]   Net Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Evaluation of Biodiesel Derived from Microalgae [J].
Batan, Liaw ;
Quinn, Jason ;
Willson, Bryan ;
Bradley, Thomas .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (20) :7975-7980
[9]  
Beal C.M., 2012, ENERGY IN PRESS
[10]   A Framework to Report the Production of Renewable Diesel from Algae [J].
Beal, Colin M. ;
Smith, Colin H. ;
Webber, Michael E. ;
Ruoff, Rodney S. ;
Hebner, Robert E. .
BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (01) :36-60