Social policy and social citizenship: Britain's welfare states

被引:24
作者
Wincott, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/publius/pjj004
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In Britain the imagery and rhetoric of the postwar welfare state remain powerful-citizens should have equal access to public services based on need not place of residence. Devolution is sometimes depicted as a threat to this tradition. This article shows that the immediate risk of a social policy race to the bottom is small. Moreover, because of the peculiarities of British territorial politics the traditional imagery was never borne out in practice; the article traces policy variation before and after devolution. Finally, locating British social policy within the comparative framework of "nationalization" and "citizenship," I argue that Britain lost its status as an exemplary welfare state partly because it failed to provide an adequate territorial framework for the development of social policy.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 188
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Alber Jens, 1995, Journal of European Social Policy, vol, V5, P131
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, PRIVATE GOVT PUBLIC
[3]  
BELL D, 2001, STATE NATIONS 2001 2, P135
[4]  
Bogdanor V., 1999, Devolution in the United Kingdom
[5]  
BOGDANOR V, 2003, FINANCIAL TIMES 1208
[6]  
Bulpitt J., 1983, Territory and Power in the UK
[7]  
Castles F.G., 1999, COMP PUBLIC POLICY
[8]   A stronger or weaker union? Public reactions to asymmetric devolution in the United Kingdom [J].
Curtice, J .
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2006, 36 (01) :95-113
[9]   The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states [J].
Daly, M ;
Lewis, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 51 (02) :281-298
[10]  
Esping-Andersen Gosta., 2000, SOCIAL FDN POSTINDUS