Assessment of a hemodialysis E-curriculum in postgraduate nephrology education: A pilot mixed methods study

被引:0
作者
Krishnan, Namrata [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brannan, Erin [1 ]
Hafler, Janet [1 ]
Brennan-Wydra, Emma [1 ]
Encandela, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Nephrol, Ground Floor,Bldg 2,950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[4] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dialysis Unit, Ground Floor,Bldg 2,950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
关键词
nephrology education; E-learning; hemodialysis; dialysis access; urea kinetics; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; INTERNET;
D O I
10.5414/CN110778
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Online education-al modules support asynchronous E-learning and offer several advantages. This multi -in-stitutional pilot study describes the experi-ence among nephrology trainees, of using a faculty-developed interactive E-curriculum in hemodialysis (HD) and examines its im-pact on learner knowledge and satisfaction.Study design: A sequential mixed method design was developed for curriculum assess-ment, using a survey tool and 1 : 1 interview. Setting and participants: Current or recent (within past 2 years) nephrology fellows from four U.S. training programs.Materials and methods: After curriculum completion, a 6-item survey was administered to all con-veniently sampled participants followed by a 1 : 1 interview of a sampled subset. Quanti-tative and qualitative data were analyzed us-ing descriptive statistics and thematic analy-sis, respectively.Results: 25 participants (18 Yale and 7 non-Yale) were recruited. All participants filled a 6-item Qualtrics survey after curriculum completion; 12/25 were interviewed. The majority were 1st (11/25) or 2nd year (8/25) nephrology fellows. Most self-identified as visual (11/25) or kinesthetic (11/25) learners. 100% participants agreed to the ease of use and clinical applicability of the E-modules; 100% found the animated videos and self-assessment sections valu-able. On a scale of 1 (not comfortable at all) to 5 (very comfortable), respondents rated their perceived level of knowledge in 6 key competency areas. Means were 2.2 (range: 2.08 - 2.6) pre-intervention and 4.1 (range: 4.0 - 4.32) post-intervention, representing a significant increase (p-value = 0.0001). Ani-mated videos were the most desired feature of the curriculum. Standardization, repeti-tion, a controlled learning environment, and flexibility were identified as key advantages of an E-curriculum. Need for a self -motivat-ed learner and lack of collaborative learning were its limitations.Conclusion: Our study highlights the effectiveness of an asynchro-nous E-curriculum in promoting active learn-ing in nephrology and provides a framework for E-curricula development. Further study is needed to assess its impact on changes in learner attitude and patient outcomes. Introduction Internet-based learning (E-learning) is an evolving pedagogical approach in nephrolo-gy education to promote active, learner -cen-tered distance education [1]. E-learning can be synchronous (a group of learners engaged simultaneously in real time, e.g., web con-ferences) or asynchronous (online modules, podcasts etc. where learners access material individually without real-time interaction).
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 255
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives
    Al-Balas, Mahmoud
    Al-Balas, Hasan Ibrahim
    Jaber, Hatim M.
    Obeidat, Khaled
    Al-Balas, Hamzeh
    Aborajooh, Emad A.
    Al-Taher, Raed
    Al-Balas, Bayan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [2] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: Medical students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning
    Alsoufi, Ahmed
    Alsuyihili, Ali
    Msherghi, Ahmed
    Elhadi, Ahmed
    Atiyah, Hana
    Ashini, Aimen
    Ashwieb, Arwa
    Ghula, Mohamed
    Ben Hasan, Hayat
    Abudabuos, Salsabil
    Alameen, Hind
    Abokhdhir, Taqwa
    Anaiba, Mohamed
    Nagib, Taha
    Shuwayyah, Anshirah
    Benothman, Rema
    Arrefae, Ghalea
    Alkhwayildi, Abdulwajid
    Alhadi, Abdulmueti
    Zaid, Ahmed
    Elhadi, Muhammed
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [3] Cohen Barry A, 2016, Can J Kidney Health Dis, V3, P30, DOI 10.1186/s40697-016-0121-x
  • [4] Instructional Design Variations in Internet-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cook, David A.
    Levinson, Anthony J.
    Garside, Sarah
    Dupras, Denise M.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (05) : 909 - 922
  • [5] de Leeuw RA, 2017, INT J MED EDUC, V8, P153, DOI 10.5116/ijme.58ce.60aa
  • [6] A cognitive perspective on technology enhanced learning in medical training: Great opportunities, pitfalls and challenges
    Dror, Itiel
    Schmidt, Pascal
    O'Connor, Lanty
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2011, 33 (04) : 291 - 296
  • [7] Ellaway R, 2008, MED TEACH, V30, P455, DOI [10.1080/01421590802108349, 10.1080/01421590802108331]
  • [8] Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis
    Hew, Khe Foon
    Lo, Chung Kwan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
  • [9] Hewitt-Taylor J, 2001, Nurs Stand, V15, P39
  • [10] Three approaches to qualitative content analysis
    Hsieh, HF
    Shannon, SE
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) : 1277 - 1288