Fracture incidence in relation to the pattern of use of hormone therapy in postmenopausal women

被引:98
作者
Banks, E [1 ]
Beral, V
Reeves, G
Balkwill, A
Barnes, I
机构
[1] Radcliffe Infirm, Epidemiol Unit, Canc Res UK, Oxford OX2 6HE, England
[2] Univ Reading, Sch Appl Stat, Reading, Berks, England
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 291卷 / 18期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.291.18.2212
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Evidence is limited on the effects of different patterns of use of postmenopausal hormone therapy on fracture incidence and particularly on the effects of ceasing use. Objective To investigate the effect of different patterns of hormone therapy use on fracture incidence. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective study of 138737 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 69 years recruited from the UK general population in 19961998 (the Million Women Study) and followed up for 1.9 to 3.9 years (average, 2.8 years) for fracture incidence. Main Outcome Measure Adjusted relative risk (RR) for incident fracture (except fracture of the fingers, toes, and ribs) in hormone therapy users compared with never users at baseline. Results A total of 5197 women (3.7%) reported 1 or more fractures, 79% resulting from falls. Current users of hormone therapy at baseline had a significantly reduced incidence of fracture (RR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.66; P<.001). This protection was evident soon after hormone therapy began, and the RR decreased with increasing duration of use (P=.001). Among current users at baseline the RR of fracture did not vary significantly according to whether estrogen-only, estrogen-progestin, or other types of hormones were used (RR [95% CI], 0.64 [0.58-0.71], 0.58 [0.53-0.64], and 0.67 [0.56-0.80], respectively; P=19), nor did it vary significantly according to estrogen dose or estrogen or progestin constituents. The RR associated with current use of hormone therapy did not vary significantly according to 11 personal characteristics of study participants, including their age at menopause, body mass index, and physical activity. Past users of hormone therapy at baseline experienced no significant protection against fractures (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.15); incidence rates returned to those of never-users within about a year of ceasing use. Conclusions All types of hormone therapy studied confer substantial protection against fracture while they are used. This protection appears rapidly after use commences and wears off rapidly after use ceases. The older women are, the greater is their absolute reduction in fracture incidence while using hormone therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:2212 / 2220
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Effects of conjugated, equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy - The women's health initiative randomized controlled trial
    Anderson, GL
    Limacher, M
    Assaf, AR
    Bassford, T
    Beresford, SAA
    Black, H
    Bonds, D
    Brunner, R
    Brzyski, R
    Caan, B
    Chlebowski, R
    Curb, D
    Gass, M
    Hays, J
    Heiss, G
    Hendrix, S
    Howard, BV
    Hsia, J
    Hubbell, A
    Jackson, R
    Johnson, KC
    Judd, H
    Kotchen, JM
    Kuller, L
    LaCroix, AZ
    Lane, D
    Langer, RD
    Lasser, N
    Lewis, CE
    Manson, J
    Margolis, K
    Ockene, J
    O'Sullivan, MJ
    Phillips, L
    Prentice, RL
    Ritenbaugh, C
    Robbins, J
    Rossouw, JE
    Sarto, G
    Stefanick, ML
    Van Horn, L
    Wactawski-Wende, J
    Wallace, R
    Wassertheil-Smoller, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14): : 1701 - 1712
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, BREAST CANCER RES, V1, P73, DOI DOI 10.1186/BCR16
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1988, HLTH DEPRIVATION INE
  • [4] Banks E, 2001, J Epidemiol Biostat, V6, P357
  • [5] Evidence from randomised trials on the long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy
    Beral, V
    Banks, E
    Reeves, G
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9337) : 942 - 944
  • [6] Beral Valerie, 2003, Lancet, V362, P419, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14065-2
  • [7] Effects of hormone therapy on bone mineral density - Results from the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial
    Bush, TL
    Wells, HB
    James, MK
    BarrettConnor, E
    Marcus, R
    Greendale, G
    Hunsberger, S
    McGowan, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (17): : 1389 - 1396
  • [8] Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density - The Women's Health Initiative randomized trial
    Cauley, JA
    Robbins, J
    Chen, Z
    Cummings, SR
    Jackson, RD
    LaCroix, AZ
    LeBoff, M
    Lewis, CE
    McGowan, J
    Neuner, J
    Pettinger, M
    Stefanick, ML
    Wactawski-Wende, J
    Watts, NB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (13): : 1729 - 1738
  • [9] ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY AND FRACTURES IN OLDER WOMEN
    CAULEY, JA
    SEELEY, DG
    ENSRUD, K
    ETTINGER, B
    BLACK, D
    CUMMINGS, SR
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 122 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [10] Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast, cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women - The Women's Health Initiative Randomized trial
    Chlebowski, RT
    Hendrix, SL
    Langer, RD
    Stefanick, ML
    Gass, M
    Lane, D
    Rodabough, RJ
    Gilligan, MA
    Cyr, MG
    Thomson, CA
    Khandekar, J
    Petrovitch, H
    McTiernan, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (24): : 3243 - 3253