Efficacy of systematic pelvic endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study

被引:1381
作者
Kitchener, H. [3 ]
Swart, A. M. C. [1 ,2 ]
Qian, W. [1 ]
Amos, C. [1 ]
Parmar, M. K. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Clin Trials Unit, Canc Grp, London NW1 2DA, England
[2] UCL, Ctr Clin Pharmacol, London, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Canc & Imaging Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
STAGE-I; LYMPHADENECTOMY; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61766-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is the standard surgery for stage I endometrial cancer. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy has been used to establish whether there is extra-uterine disease and as a therapeutic procedure; however, randomised trials need to be done to assess therapeutic efficacy. The ASTEC surgical trial investigated whether pelvic lymphadenectomy could improve survival of women with endometrial cancer. Methods From 85 centres in four countries, 1408 women with histologically proven endometrial carcinoma thought preoperatively to be confined to the corpus were randomly allocated by a minimisation method to standard surgery (hysterectomy and BSO, peritoneal washings, and palpation of para-aortic nodes; n=704) or standard surgery plus lymphadenectomy (n=704). The primary outcome measure was overall survival. To control for postsurgical treatment, women with early-stage disease at intermediate or high risk of recurrence were randomised (independent of lymph-node status) into the ASTEC radiotherapy trial. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 1.6571884. Findings After a median follow-up of 37 months (IQR 24-58), 191 women (88 standard surgery group, 103 lymphadenectomy group) had died, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.16 (95% Cl 0.87-1.54; p=0.31) in favour of standard surgery and an absolute difference in 5-year overall survival of 1% (95% Cl -4 to 6). 251 women died or had recurrent disease (1.07 standard surgery group, 144 lymphadenectomy group), with an HR of 1.35 (1.06-1.73; p=0.017) in favour of standard surgery and an absolute difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival of 6% (1-12). With adjustment for baseline characteristics and pathology details, the HR for overall survival was 1 . 04 (0.74-1.45; p=0 . 83) and for recurrence-free survival was 1. 25 (0.93-1.66; p=0.14). Interpretation Our results show no evidence of benefit in terms of overall or recurrence-free survival for pelvic lymphadenectonny in women with early endometrial cancer. Pelvic lymphadenectomy cannot be recommended as routine procedure for therapeutic purposes outside of clinical trials. Funding Medical Research Council and National Cancer Research Network.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 136
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] 2-8
  • [12] Long-term survival of intermediate risk endometrial cancer (Stage IG3, IC, II) treated with full lymphadenectomy and brachytherapy without teletherapy
    Fanning, J
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 82 (02) : 371 - 374
  • [13] A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Keys, HM
    Roberts, JA
    Brunetto, VL
    Zaino, RJ
    Spirtos, NM
    Bloss, JD
    Pearlman, A
    Maiman, MA
    Bell, JG
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 92 (03) : 744 - 751
  • [14] ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ENDOMETRIUM - SURVIVAL COMPARISONS OF PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT PELVIC NODE SAMPLING
    KILGORE, LC
    PARTRIDGE, EE
    ALVAREZ, RD
    AUSTIN, JM
    SHINGLETON, HM
    NOOJIN, F
    CONNER, W
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 56 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [15] Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kong, A.
    Simera, I.
    Collingwood, M.
    Williams, C.
    Kitchener, H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (10) : 1595 - 1604
  • [16] Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology
    Lutman, Christopher V.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Cragun, Janiel M.
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Calingaert, Brian
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Clarke-Pearson, Daniel L.
    Soper, John T.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 102 (01) : 92 - 97
  • [17] Long-term outcomes of therapeutic pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma
    Mohan, DS
    Samuels, MA
    Selim, MA
    Shalodi, AD
    Ellis, RJ
    Samuels, JR
    Yun, HJ
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 70 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [18] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURGICAL PATHOLOGICAL RISK-FACTORS AND OUTCOME IN CLINICAL STAGE-I AND STAGE-II CARCINOMA OF THE ENDOMETRIUM - A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY
    MORROW, CP
    BUNDY, BN
    KURMAN, RJ
    CREASMAN, WT
    HELLER, P
    HOMESLEY, HD
    GRAHAM, JE
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1991, 40 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [19] Systematic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy vs No Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: Randomized Clinical Trial
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    Basile, Stefano
    Maneschi, Francesco
    Lissoni, Andrea Alberto
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Angioli, Roberto
    Tateo, Saverio
    Mangili, Giorgia
    Katsaros, Dionyssios
    Garozzo, Gaetano
    Campagnutta, Elio
    Donadello, Nicoletta
    Greggi, Stefano
    Melpignano, Mauro
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Ragni, Nicola
    Cormio, Gennaro
    Grassi, Roberto
    Franchi, Massimo
    Giannarelli, Diana
    Fossati, Roldano
    Torri, Valter
    Amoroso, Mariangela
    Croce, Clara
    Mangioni, Costantino
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (23): : 1707 - 1716
  • [20] EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94-results and commentary
    Sant, M.
    Aareleid, T.
    Berrino, F.
    Lasota, M. Bielska
    Carli, P. M.
    Faivre, J.
    Grosclaude, P.
    Hedelin, G.
    Matsuda, T.
    Moller, H.
    Moller, T.
    Verdecchia, A.
    Capocaccia, R.
    Gatta, G.
    Micheli, A.
    Santaquilani, M.
    Roazzi, P.
    Lisi, D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 : V61 - V118