Clinical tools that measure sitting posture, seated postural control or functional abilities in children with motor impairments: a systematic review

被引:17
作者
Field, Debra [1 ]
Livingstone, Roslyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Sunny Hill Hlth Ctr Children, Vancouver, BC V5M 3E8, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Measurement; wheelchair; posture; child rehabilitation; systematic review; OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE-MEASURE; ADAPTIVE SEATING DEVICES; CEREBRAL-PALSY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; HAND FUNCTION; TRUNK; POSITION; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1177/0269215513488122
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify and critically appraise clinical measurement tools used to assess sitting posture, seated postural control or functional abilities for children with motor impairment who are candidates for seating interventions. Data sources: Searches were run in 15 electronic databases along with hand searching. The search included articles published in English to December 2011. Review methods: Key terms included: posture, sitting, sitting posture, seated posture, seated postural control, sitting position, seating, wheelchair(s), outcome and assess(ment). The PRISMA statement was followed with inclusion criteria set a priori. Two reviewers independently screened titles, reviewed abstracts and identified full-text articles that met criteria. Data extraction included tool description and clinical utility. Two quality-rating scales were used to evaluate conduct of the studies and psychometric properties of the tools. Results: Of the 497 titles found in the search, 29 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria and 19 tools were identified. Tools represented all components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY), with emphasis on body structure and function and activity components. Evidence supporting reliability and validity varied, with small sample sizes influencing quality ratings. Evidence of the tools' reliability was more prevalent than evidence of the tools' validity. Only four tools reported on responsiveness, an important consideration for evaluating change. Little information on clinical utility was provided. Conclusion: Although a number of tools are available, evidence supporting their use for seating interventions is limited, as is the evidence supporting the strength of their measurement properties. Few tools address participation, environmental factors or the child's and family's perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1004
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, OUTCOME MEASURES RAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, CANADIAN J REHABILIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], AUST OCCUP THER J
[4]  
[Anonymous], AUST OCCUP THER J
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U W ONTARIO L
[6]  
[Anonymous], PHYSIOTHERAPY
[7]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN EPIDEMIOL
[8]  
[Anonymous], SEATED POSTURAL CONT
[9]  
[Anonymous], PHYSIOTHERAPY
[10]   HEAD POSITION TRAINER APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH AND CLINICAL USE [J].
ASHTON, B ;
KRAMER, JF ;
HEAVER, A .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1986, 66 (08) :1228-1232