Yield response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to different types of drought under rainfed lowlands -: Part 3.: Plant factors contributing to drought resistance

被引:114
作者
Pantuwan, G [1 ]
Fukai, S
Cooper, M
Rajatasereekul, S
O'Toole, JC
机构
[1] Ubon Ratchathani Rice Res Ctr, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Land & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Chum Phae Rice Expt Stn, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[4] Rockefeller Fdn, Bangkok Reg Off, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
rice; rainfed lowland; drought; traits; root systems; water extraction; water potential;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00194-0
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A series of experiments were conducted in drought-prone northeast Thailand to examine the magnitude of yield responses of diverse genotypes to drought stress environments and to identify traits that may confer drought resistance to rainfed lowland rice. One hundred and twenty eight genotypes were grown under non-stress and four different types of drought stress conditions. Under severe drought conditions, the maintenance of PWP of genotypes played a significant role in determining final grain yield. Because of their smaller plant size (lower total dry matter at anthesis) genotypes that extracted less soil water during the early stages of the drought period, tended to maintain higher PWP and had a higher fertile panicle percentage, filled grain percentage and final grain yield than other genotypes. PWP was correlated with delay in flowering (r = -0.387) indicating that the latter could be used as a measure of water potential under stress. Genotypes with well-developed root systems extracted water too rapidly and experienced severe water stress at flowering. RPR which showed smaller coefficient of variation was more useful than root mass density in identifying genotypes with large root system. Under less severe and prolonged drought conditions, genotypes that could achieve higher plant dry matter at anthesis were desirable. They had less delay in flowering, higher grain yield and higher drought response index, indicating the importance of ability to grow during the prolonged stress period. Other shoot characters (osmotic potential, leaf temperature, leaf rolling, leaf death) had little effect on grain yield under different drought conditions. This was associated with a lack of genetic variation and difficulty in estimating trait values precisely. Under mild stress conditions (yield loss less than 50%), there was no significant relationship between the measured drought characters and grain yield. Under these mild drought conditions, yield is determined more by yield potential and phenotype than by drought resistant mechanisms per se. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 200
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, RIC ALM
[2]  
[Anonymous], STRESS PHYSL CROP PL
[3]   CONTRIBUTION OF STORED PRE-ANTHESIS ASSIMILATE TO GRAIN-YIELD IN WHEAT AND BARLEY [J].
BIDINGER, F ;
MUSGRAVE, RB ;
FISCHER, RA .
NATURE, 1977, 270 (5636) :431-433
[4]  
BLUM A, 1993, INTERNATIONAL CROP SCIENCE I, P343
[5]   The effect of dwarfing genes on sorghum grain filling from remobilized stem reserves, under stress [J].
Blum, A ;
Golan, G ;
Mayer, J ;
Sinmena, B .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1997, 52 (1-2) :43-54
[6]  
Blum A, 1989, PLANTS STRESS, P197, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511661587.012
[7]   Effects of soil water deficit at different growth stages on rice growth and yield under upland conditions .2. Phenology, biomass production and yield [J].
Boonjung, H ;
Fukai, S .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1996, 48 (01) :47-55
[8]   DRYLAND RICE RESPONSE TO AN IRRIGATION GRADIENT AT FLOWERING STAGE [J].
CRUZ, RT ;
OTOOLE, JC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (02) :178-183
[9]   A FIELD SCREENING TECHNIQUE FOR EVALUATING RICE GERMPLASM FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE DURING THE VEGETATIVE STAGE [J].
DEDATTA, SK ;
MALABUYOC, JA ;
ARAGON, EL .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1988, 19 (02) :123-134
[10]   INHERITANCE OF ROOT CHARACTERS AND THEIR RELATIONS TO DROUGHT RESISTANCE IN RICE [J].
EKANAYAKE, IJ ;
OTOOLE, JC ;
GARRITY, DP ;
MASAJO, TM .
CROP SCIENCE, 1985, 25 (06) :927-933