Do energy intensity targets matter for wind energy development? Identifying their heterogeneous effects in Chinese provinces with different wind resources

被引:31
作者
Zhang, Pan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, 1954 Huashan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, 1954 Huashan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy intensity targets; Wind resource endowment; Wind energy generation capacity; Difference-in-difference; Causal inference; Governance; FEED-IN TARIFF; POWER DEVELOPMENT; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POLICY; PERFORMANCE; INCENTIVES; EVOLUTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Setting energy intensity targets is an important policy instrument that addresses the shortage of energy resources and the increase of carbon emissions in China, but no study has empirically investigated the effects of energy intensity targets on renewable energy development. Based on panel data of Chinese provinces from 2001 to 2014, in this study a novel difference-in-difference design is applied to identify the causal relationship between energy intensity targets and wind energy generation capacities. The results show that mandatory energy intensity targets can drive provinces to develop renewable wind energy. The incentive effects of energy intensity targets on wind energy development are also significantly stronger for provinces with higher levels of wind resources than provinces with lower levels. These results are robust to a test set that reveals a positive moderating effect of energy intensity targets on the relationship between wind resources and wind energy generation capacities, based on alternative energy intensity target measures. The findings confirm that China's target responsibility system can play an important role in promoting renewable energy development. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 975
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Do energy efficiency measures really reduce household energy consumption? A difference-in-difference analysis
    Adan, Hassan
    Fuerst, Franz
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2016, 9 (05) : 1207 - 1219
  • [2] Comparison of Wind Energy Support Policy and Electricity Market Design in Europe, the United States, and Australia
    Aparicio, Nestor
    MacGill, Iain
    Rivier Abbad, Juan
    Beltran, Hector
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2012, 3 (04) : 809 - 818
  • [3] Berry F.S., 2007, Theories of the policy process, V2, P223, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780367274689-8
  • [4] Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States
    Bird, L
    Bolinger, M
    Gagliano, T
    Wiser, R
    Brown, M
    Parsons, B
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (11) : 1397 - 1407
  • [5] Estimating the political, economic and environmental factors' impact on the installed wind capacity development: A system GMM approach
    Biresselioglu, Mehmet Efe
    Kilinc, Dilara
    Onater-Isberk, Esra
    Yelkenci, Tezer
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 96 : 636 - 644
  • [6] Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development
    Butler, Lucy
    Neuhoff, Karsten
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (08) : 1854 - 1867
  • [7] Why invest in wind energy? Career incentives and Chinese renewable energy politics
    Cao, Xun
    Kleit, Andrew
    Liu, Chuyu
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 99 : 120 - 131
  • [8] Chen Q., 2014, Advanced econometrics and Stata applications
  • [9] Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development
    Dong, C. G.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 : 476 - 485
  • [10] Credible commitment and council-manager government: Implications for policy instrument choices
    Feiock, RC
    Jeong, MG
    Kim, J
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (05) : 616 - 625