The neurocognitive phenotype of apathy following acquired brain damage

被引:0
作者
Njomboro, Progress [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Psychol, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
acquired brain damage; apathy; dysexecutive syndrome; executive function; Tower of Hanoi; EXECUTIVE DYSFUNCTION; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS; DEPRESSION; DEFICITS; CONFLICT; DEMENTIA; VALIDITY; TOWER; TESTS;
D O I
10.1177/008124631204200309
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Apathy is one of the most common neuropsychiatric sequelae of acquired brain damage. The disorder is usually defined in terms of observed deficits in motivation related behavioural, emotional, and cognitive aspects of goal directed activity. Most neuropsychological research on apathy has focused primarily on its associated neurocognitive correlates; particularly those related to executive dysfunction, or its association with other clinical syndromes like depression. Results from these studies have been mixed, probably reflecting the use of different neuropsychiatric samples and assessment tools, or reflecting the differences in the conceptualisation of apathy across studies. In this study we ask whether performance on 'standard' executive tests would distinguish brain-damaged patients with apathy symptoms from those without apathy. To potentially strengthen the power of the possible relationships between apathy and executive function we included brain-injured patients with varied aetiologies, and used a much broader range of 'executive function' tests than in previous studies. Results indicate that the Tower of Hanoi puzzle is sensitive to apathy symptoms. Patients with apathy symptoms were significantly impaired on the task compared to non-apathetic patients. Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting test, the Hayling and Brixton tests, and the Stroop test failed to show this distinction. We discuss these findings and their implications for treatment and rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Cognitive correlates of apathy in traumatic brain injury
    Andersson, S
    Bergedalen, AM
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRY NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY, 2002, 15 (03): : 184 - 191
  • [2] Are central executive functions working in patients with focal frontal lesions?
    Andrés, P
    Van der Linden, M
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2002, 40 (07) : 835 - 845
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1987, Handbook Physiol, DOI 10.1002/cphy.cp010509
  • [4] On the evolutionary origins of executive functions
    Ardila, Alfredo
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2008, 68 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [5] Bigler E D, 1988, Arch Clin Neuropsychol, V3, P279, DOI 10.1016/0887-6177(88)90020-0
  • [6] Negative symptoms: the 'pathology' of motivation and goal-directed behaviour
    Brown, RG
    Pluck, G
    [J]. TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2000, 23 (09) : 412 - 417
  • [7] Burgess P., 1997, Methodology of frontal and executive function, P81, DOI DOI 10.1024//1016-264X.10.2.123
  • [8] Burgess P. W., 1997, The Hayling and Brixton tests
  • [9] The ecological validity of tests of executive function
    Burgess, PW
    Alderman, N
    Evans, J
    Emslie, H
    Wilson, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 4 (06) : 547 - 558
  • [10] Functional neuroanatomy of the frontal lobe circuits
    Burruss, JW
    Hurley, RA
    Taber, KH
    Rauch, RA
    Norton, RE
    Hayman, LA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) : 227 - 230