Comparison of Four Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples from Tunja, Boyaci, Colombia

被引:3
作者
Salamanca-Neita, Lorenzo H. [1 ,2 ]
Carvajal, Oscar [1 ]
Pablo Carvajal, Juan [1 ]
Forero-Castro, Maribel [2 ]
Alexandra Segura, Nidya [2 ]
机构
[1] SAS, Lab Carvajal IPS, Tunja 150003, Colombia
[2] Univ Pedag & Tecnol Colombia, Fac Ciencias, Grp Invest Ciencias Biomed, Tunja 150003, Colombia
关键词
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2); COVID-19; molecular diagnostics; real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR);
D O I
10.3390/tropicalmed7090240
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. In Colombia, many commercial methods are now available to perform the RT-qPCR assays, and laboratories must evaluate their diagnostic accuracy to ensure reliable results for patients suspected of being positive for COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to compare four commercial RT-qPCR assays with respect to their ability to detect the SARS-CoV2 virus from nasopharyngeal swab samples referred to Laboratorio Carvajal IPS, SAS in Tunja, Boyaca, Colombia. We utilized 152 respiratory tract samples (Nasopharyngeal Swabs) from patients suspected of having SARS-CoV-2. The diagnostic accuracy of GeneFinder (TM) COVID-19 Plus RealAmp (In Vitro Diagnostics) (GF-TM), One-Step Real-Time RT-PCR (Vitro Master Diagnostica) (O-S RT-qPCR), and the Berlin modified protocol (BM) were assessed using the gold-standard Berlin protocol (Berlin Charite Probe One-Step RT-qPCR Kit, New England Biolabs) (BR) as a reference. Operational characteristics were estimated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and predictive values. Using the gold-standard BR as a reference, the sensitivity/specificity of the diagnostic tests was found to be 100%/92.7% for GF-TM, 92.75%/67.47% for O-S RT-qPCR, and 100%/96.39% for the BM protocol. Using BR as a reference, the sensitivity/specificity for the diagnostic tests were found to be 100%/92.7% for the GF-TM assay, 92.72%/67.47% for the O-S RT-qPCR, and 100%/96.39% for BM. Relative to the BR reference protocol, the GF-TM and BM RT-PCR assays obtained similar results (k = 0.92 and k = 0.96, respectively), whereas the results obtained by O-S-RT-qPCR were only moderately similar. We conclude that the GF-TM and BM protocols offer the best sensitivity and specificity, with similar results in comparison to the gold-standard BR protocol. We recommend evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the OS-RT-qPCR protocol in future studies with a larger number of samples.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Castro A.L.L., 2015, MANUAL TOMA MUESTRAS, V2015
[2]   Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR (Publication with Expression of Concern) [J].
Corman, Victor M. ;
Landt, Olfert ;
Kaiser, Marco ;
Molenkamp, Richard ;
Meijer, Adam ;
Chu, Daniel K. W. ;
Bleicker, Tobias ;
Bruenink, Sebastian ;
Schneider, Julia ;
Schmidt, Marie Luisa ;
Mulders, Daphne G. J. C. ;
Haagmans, Bart L. ;
van der Veer, Bas ;
van den Brink, Sharon ;
Wijsman, Lisa ;
Goderski, Gabriel ;
Romette, Jean-Louis ;
Ellis, Joanna ;
Zambon, Maria ;
Peiris, Malik ;
Goossens, Herman ;
Reusken, Chantal ;
Koopmans, Marion P. G. ;
Drosten, Christian .
EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2020, 25 (03) :23-30
[3]   Highly accurate and sensitive diagnostic detection of SARS-CoV-2 by digital PCR [J].
Dong, Lianhua ;
Zhou, Junbo ;
Niu, Chunyan ;
Wang, Quanyi ;
Pan, Yang ;
Sheng, Sitong ;
Wang, Xia ;
Zhang, Yongzhuo ;
Yang, Jiayi ;
Liu, Manqing ;
Zhao, Yang ;
Zhang, Xiaoying ;
Zhu, Tao ;
Peng, Tao ;
Xie, Jie ;
Gao, Yunhua ;
Wang, Di ;
Dai, Xinhua ;
Fang, Xiang .
TALANTA, 2021, 224
[4]   Diagnostic test accuracy of antigenaemia assay for PCR-proven cytomegalovirus infectiondsystematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Eguchi, H. ;
Horita, N. ;
Ushio, R. ;
Kato, I. ;
Nakajima, Y. ;
Ota, E. ;
Kaneko, T. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2017, 23 (12) :907-915
[5]   Negative results in nucleic acid test of COVID-19 patients: assessment from the perspective of clinical laboratories [J].
Guo, Wenjia ;
Zhou, Qi ;
Xu, Jiancheng .
ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) :4246-4251
[6]   Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in a Multiplex Bead Assay for Integrated Serological Surveillance of Neglected Tropical and Other Diseases [J].
Gwyn, Sarah ;
Abubakar, Ado ;
Akinmulero, Oluwaseun ;
Bergeron, Eric ;
Blessing, Ugboaja Nkechi ;
Chaitram, Jasmine ;
Coughlin, Melissa M. ;
Dawurung, Ayuba B. ;
Dickson, Felicia Nwatu ;
Esiekpe, Mudiaga ;
Evbuomwan, Erasogie ;
Greby, Stacie M. ;
Iriemenam, Nnaemeka C. ;
Kainulainen, Markus H. ;
Naanpoen, Thomas Andrew ;
Napoloen, Loveth ;
Odoh, Ifeanyichukwu ;
Okoye, McPaul ;
Olaleye, Temitope ;
Schuh, Amy J. ;
Owen, S. Michele ;
Samuel, Awala ;
Martin, Diana L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2022, 107 (02) :260-267
[7]   Comparison of Anyplex II RV16 with the xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel and Seeplex RV15 for Detection of Respiratory Viruses [J].
Kim, Hyun-Ki ;
Oh, Sung-Hee ;
Yun, Kyung Ah ;
Sung, Heungsup ;
Kim, Mi-Na .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (04) :1137-1141
[8]   SARS-CoV-2-specific virulence factors in COVID-19 [J].
Kumar, Ashutosh ;
Prasoon, Pranav ;
Kumari, Chiman ;
Pareek, Vikas ;
Faiq, Muneeb A. ;
Narayan, Ravi K. ;
Kulandhasamy, Maheswari ;
Kant, Kamla .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (03) :1343-1350
[9]   Safety and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ling, Yunzhi ;
Zhong, Jiaying ;
Luo, Jiaru .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (12) :6486-6495
[10]   Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay [J].
Liu, Min ;
Li, Qianyuan ;
Zhou, Jun ;
Ai, Wen ;
Zheng, Xiaoling ;
Zeng, Jingjing ;
Liu, Yuwen ;
Xiang, Xiying ;
Guo, Rong ;
Li, Xiaoyin ;
Wu, Xiandi ;
Xu, Haiying ;
Jiang, Ling ;
Zhang, Huaqin ;
Chen, Jing ;
Tian, Lili ;
Luo, Jun ;
Luo, Chunhua .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 286