Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting

被引:48
作者
Gibbons, Philip [1 ]
Macintosh, Andrew [2 ]
Constable, Amy Louise [2 ]
Hayashi, Kiichiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Nagoya Univ, Civil & Environm Engn Int Programs Off, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
averted loss; avoided loss; biodiversity offsets; deforestation; land clearing; restoration; NO-NET-LOSS; WETLAND MITIGATION; ET-AL; POLICY; CONSERVATION; COVER; TIME; DEFORESTATION; LANDSCAPE; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.13977
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We quantified net changes to the area and quality of native vegetation after the introduction of biodiversity offsetting in New South Wales, Australiaa policy intended to "prevent broad-scale clearing of native vegetation unless it improves or maintains environmental values." Over 10 years, a total of 21,928 ha of native vegetation was approved for clearing under this policy and 83,459 ha was established as biodiversity offsets. We estimated that no net loss in the area of native vegetation under this policy will not occur for 146 years. This is because 82% of the total area offset was obtained by averting losses to existing native vegetation and the rate that these averted losses accrue was over-estimated in the policy. There were predicted net gains in 10 of the 14 attributes used to assess the quality of habitat. An overall net gain in the quality of habitat was assessed under this policy by substituting habitat attributes that are difficult to restore (e.g. mature trees) with habitat attributes for which restoration is relatively easy (e.g. tree seedlings). Long-term rates of annual deforestation did not significantly change across the study area after biodiversity offsetting was introduced. Overall, the policy examined here provides no net loss of biodiversity: (i) many generations into the future, which is not consistent with intergenerational equity; and (ii) by substituting different habitat attributes, so gains are not equivalent to losses. We recommend a number of changes to biodiversity offsetting policy to overcome these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:E643 / E654
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Expert predictions of changes in vegetation condition reveal perceived risks in biodiversity offsetting
    Dorrough, Josh
    Sinclair, Steve J.
    Oliver, Ian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [42] "Biodiversity Offsetting" in Uganda's Protected Areas: A Pathway to Restoration of Forest Biodiversity?
    Kigonya, Ritah
    Byakagaba, Patrick
    Ssenyonjo, Edward
    Jjunju, Charlotte Nakakaawa
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 73 (06) : 1134 - 1149
  • [43] Compensating for lost nature values through biodiversity offsetting-Where is the evidence?
    Josefsson, Jonas
    Widenfalk, Lina Ahlback
    Blicharska, Malgorzata
    Hedblom, Marcus
    Part, Tomas
    Ranius, Thomas
    Ockinger, Erik
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 257
  • [44] Exploring the practical implementation of marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia
    Niner, Holly J.
    Jones, Peter J. S.
    Milligan, Ben
    Styan, Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 295
  • [45] Application and attitudes: active restoration in the context of biodiversity offsetting
    Hernandez, Stephanie
    Dorrough, Josh
    Ruoso, Laure-Elise
    Brazill-Boast, James
    Newman, Kate
    Oliver, Ian
    Plant, Roel
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [46] Improving averted loss estimates for better biodiversity outcomes from offset exchanges
    Maseyk, Fleur J. F.
    Maron, Martine
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Bull, Joseph W.
    Evans, Megan C.
    [J]. ORYX, 2021, 55 (03) : 393 - 403
  • [47] Planning impact avoidance and biodiversity offsetting using software for spatial conservation prioritisation
    Moilanen, Atte
    [J]. WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 40 (02) : 153 - 162
  • [48] Institutions for governing biodiversity offsetting: An analysis of rights and responsibilities
    Primmer, Eeva
    Varumo, Liisa
    Kotilainen, Juha M.
    Raitanen, Elina
    Kattainen, Matti
    Pekkonen, Minna
    Kuusela, Saija
    Kullberg, Peter
    Kangas, Johanna A. M.
    Ollikainen, Markku
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 : 776 - 784
  • [49] The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales
    Damiens, Florence L. P.
    Porter, Libby
    Gordon, Ascelin
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (02) : 170 - 179
  • [50] Integrating species metrics into biodiversity offsetting calculations to improve long-term persistence
    Marshall, Erica
    Visintin, Casey
    Valavi, Roozbeh
    Wilkinson, David P.
    Southwell, Darren
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Kujala, Heini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (04) : 1060 - 1071