Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting

被引:48
作者
Gibbons, Philip [1 ]
Macintosh, Andrew [2 ]
Constable, Amy Louise [2 ]
Hayashi, Kiichiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Nagoya Univ, Civil & Environm Engn Int Programs Off, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
averted loss; avoided loss; biodiversity offsets; deforestation; land clearing; restoration; NO-NET-LOSS; WETLAND MITIGATION; ET-AL; POLICY; CONSERVATION; COVER; TIME; DEFORESTATION; LANDSCAPE; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.13977
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We quantified net changes to the area and quality of native vegetation after the introduction of biodiversity offsetting in New South Wales, Australiaa policy intended to "prevent broad-scale clearing of native vegetation unless it improves or maintains environmental values." Over 10 years, a total of 21,928 ha of native vegetation was approved for clearing under this policy and 83,459 ha was established as biodiversity offsets. We estimated that no net loss in the area of native vegetation under this policy will not occur for 146 years. This is because 82% of the total area offset was obtained by averting losses to existing native vegetation and the rate that these averted losses accrue was over-estimated in the policy. There were predicted net gains in 10 of the 14 attributes used to assess the quality of habitat. An overall net gain in the quality of habitat was assessed under this policy by substituting habitat attributes that are difficult to restore (e.g. mature trees) with habitat attributes for which restoration is relatively easy (e.g. tree seedlings). Long-term rates of annual deforestation did not significantly change across the study area after biodiversity offsetting was introduced. Overall, the policy examined here provides no net loss of biodiversity: (i) many generations into the future, which is not consistent with intergenerational equity; and (ii) by substituting different habitat attributes, so gains are not equivalent to losses. We recommend a number of changes to biodiversity offsetting policy to overcome these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:E643 / E654
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 'Better than Doing Nothing' - constructing support for biodiversity offsetting in Finland
    Karlsson, Thomas Molnar
    Karhunmaa, Kamilla
    CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2024, 18 (02) : 165 - 184
  • [32] No net loss of what, for whom?: stakeholder perspectives to Biodiversity Offsetting in England
    Oliver Taherzadeh
    Peter Howley
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2018, 20 : 1807 - 1830
  • [33] Realising a vision of no net loss through marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia
    Niner, Holly J.
    Milligan, Ben
    Jones, Peter J. S.
    Styan, Craig A.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 148 : 22 - 30
  • [34] Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: refraning nature to save it
    Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
    Adams, William M.
    ORYX, 2017, 51 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [35] Biodiversity offsetting: problematisation of an emerging governance regime
    Tregidga, Helen
    ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2013, 26 (05): : 806 - 832
  • [36] Are biodiversity offsetting targets of ecological equivalence feasible for biogenic reef habitats?
    Stone, Rebecca
    Callaway, Ruth
    Bull, James C.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 177 : 97 - 111
  • [37] Biodiversity Offsetting: Ethical Views within Environmental Organisations in the European Union
    Karlsson, Mikael
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [38] Landholder perceptions of biodiversity offsetting rights and responsibilities: implications for policy reform in New South Wales, Australia
    Plant, Roel
    Ruoso, Laure-Elise
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [39] Categories of flexibility in biodiversity offsetting, and their implications for conservation
    Bull, J. W.
    Hardy, M. J.
    Moilanen, A.
    Gordon, A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 192 : 522 - 532
  • [40] Biodiversity offsetting: what are the challenges, opportunities and research priorities for animal conservation?
    Evans, D. M.
    Altwegg, R.
    Garner, T. W. J.
    Gompper, M. E.
    Gordon, I. J.
    Johnson, J. A.
    Pettorelli, N.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 18 (01) : 1 - 3