Information systems strategy: Past, present, future?

被引:115
作者
Merali, Yasmin [1 ]
Papadopoulos, Thanos [2 ]
Nadkarni, Tanvee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hull, Sch Business, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
Strategic information systems domain; Complex adaptive systems; Network dynamics; Coevolution of physical and social technologies; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; KEY ISSUES; MANAGEMENT ISSUES; TECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS; ALIGNMENT; INNOVATION; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsis.2012.04.002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the current discourse in the Strategic Information Systems (SIS) domain about the future and identity of SIS. We draw on Nelson's theorisation of the co-evolution of Physical and Social Technologies to redefine the SIS domain as a Complex Adaptive System (CAS) for the co-evolution of ICT and organisational capabilities and business models to create social and economic value. We conduct a meta-analysis of the domain based on a longitudinal review of SIS research over 33 years, and contrary to contemporaneous SIS literature which suggests that a paradigm shift may be necessary to address the increased turbulence, uncertainty and dynamism in the emerging competitive landscape, we find that the SIS research domain has the requisite adaptive capacity to evolve gracefully to address the challenges of the emerging networked competitive landscape. Drawing on complexity science and network theory we identify four priorities for the development of the domain for the future: conceptualisation of the SIS Domain as a CAS for the co-evolution of Physical and Social Technologies; the adoption of the network paradigm; access to a science of networks; and adoption of Complexity Science as an articulation device within SIS and across disciplines. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 153
页数:29
相关论文
共 197 条
[1]   Management fashion [J].
Abrahamson, E .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (01) :254-285
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   Statistical mechanics of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Barabási, AL .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2002, 74 (01) :47-97
[4]   Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Jeong, H ;
Barabási, AL .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6794) :378-382
[5]   Complexity theory and organization science [J].
Anderson, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (03) :216-232
[6]  
Anderson P.W., 1988, EC EVOLVING COMPLEX
[7]   Organisational learning and core capabilities development: The role of IT [J].
Andreu, R ;
Ciborra, C .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1996, 5 (02) :111-127
[8]  
[Anonymous], SERIES SCI COMPLEXIT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, The structure and dynamics of networks
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier