Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:234
|
作者
Haas, David M. [1 ]
Caldwell, Deborah M. [2 ]
Kirkpatrick, Page [1 ]
McIntosh, Jennifer J. [1 ]
Welton, Nicky J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2012年 / 345卷
关键词
OXYTOCIN ANTAGONIST ATOSIBAN; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; MIXED TREATMENT COMPARISONS; PATENT DUCTUS-ARTERIOSUS; MAGNESIUM-SULFATE; PREMATURE LABOR; DOUBLE-BLIND; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RITODRINE HYDROCHLORIDE; TRANSDERMAL NITROGLYCERIN;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.e6226
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the most effective tocolytic agent at delaying delivery. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and CINAHL up to 17 February 2012. Study selection Randomised controlled trials of tocolytic therapy in women at risk of preterm delivery. Data extraction At least two reviewers extracted data on study design, characteristics, number of participants, and outcomes reported (neonatal and maternal). A network meta-analysis was done using a random effects model with drug class effect. Two sensitivity analyses were carried out for the primary outcome; restricted to studies at low risk of bias and restricted to studies excluding women at high risk of preterm delivery (those with multiple gestation and ruptured membranes). Results Of the 3263 titles initially identified, 95 randomized controlled trials of tocolytic therapy were reviewed. Compared with placebo, the probability of delivery being delayed by 48 hours was highest with prostaglandin inhibitors (odds ratio 5.39, 95% credible interval 2.14 to 12.34) followed by magnesium sulfate (2.76, 1.58 to 4.94), calcium channel blockers (2.71, 1.17 to 5.91), beta mimetics (2.41, 1.27 to 4.55), and the oxytocin receptor blocker atosiban (2.02, 1.10 to 3.80). No class of tocolytic was significantly superior to placebo in reducing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Compared with placebo, side effects requiring a change of medication were significantly higher for beta mimetics (22.68, 7.51 to 73.67), magnesium sulfate (8.15, 2.47 to 27.70), and calcium channel blockers (3.80, 1.02 to 16.92). Prostaglandin inhibitors and calcium channel blockers were the tocolytics with the best probability of being ranked in the top three medication classes for the outcomes of 48 hour delay in delivery, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal mortality, and maternal side effects (all cause). Conclusions Prostaglandin inhibitors and calcium channel blockers had the highest probability of delaying delivery and improving neonatal and maternal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tocolytic Therapy - A Meta-Analysis and Decision Analysis
    Haas, David M.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Kirkpatrick, Page R.
    Klein, Robert W.
    Zollinger, Terrell W.
    Golichowski, Alan M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (03) : 585 - 594
  • [2] Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis (0924)
    Wilson, Amie
    Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria A.
    Marson, Ella J.
    Markland, Alexandra D.
    Larkai, Eva
    Papadopoulou, Argyro
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    Tobias, Aurelio
    Chou, Doris
    Oladapo, Olufemi T.
    Price, Malcolm J.
    Morris, Katie
    Gallos, Ioannis D.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (08):
  • [3] Progestogens for Preterm Birth Prevention A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Likis, Frances E.
    Edwards, Digna R. Velez
    Andrews, Jeffrey C.
    Woodworth, Alison L.
    Jerome, Rebecca N.
    Fonnesbeck, Christopher J.
    McKoy, J. Nikki
    Hartmann, Katherine E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (04) : 897 - 907
  • [4] Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for preterm premature rupture of membranes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lin, Li-Ling
    Hung, Jo -Ni
    Shiu, Sz-Iuan
    Su, Yu-Hui
    Chen, Wei-Chih
    Tseng, Jenn-Jhy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (07)
  • [5] Dexamethasone versus betamethasone for preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Klein, Karen
    Colaci, Daniela
    Althabe, Fernando
    Belizan, Jose M.
    Deegan, Allie
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Florez, Ivan D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2021, 3 (03)
  • [6] Association between omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and lower risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Lu
    Li, Yuxin
    Xie, Wei
    Xue, Xiaoou
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (12) : 2294 - 2303
  • [7] Antiplatelet therapy and coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Panchal, Puru
    Pandey, Arjun
    Basha, Ameen
    Pallo, Lindsay
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Mehta, Shamir
    Schwalm, J-D
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 31 (03) : 354 - 363
  • [8] Assessment of Postnatal Corticosteroids for the Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Neonates A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Ramaswamy, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry
    Bandyopadhyay, Tapas
    Nanda, Debasish
    Bandiya, Prathik
    Ahmed, Javed
    Garg, Anip
    Roehr, Charles C.
    Nangia, Sushma
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2021, 175 (06)
  • [9] Tuberculosis preventive therapy for people living with HIV: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yanes-Lane, Mercedes
    Ortiz-Brizuela, Edgar
    Campbell, Jonathon
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Churchyard, Gavin
    Oxlade, Olivia
    Menzies, Dick
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (09)
  • [10] Probiotics for Preterm Infants: A Strain-Specific Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    van den Akker, Chris H. P.
    van Goudoever, Johannes B.
    Szajewska, Hania
    Embleton, Nicholas D.
    Hojsak, Iva
    Reid, Daan
    Shamir, Raanan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2018, 67 (01) : 103 - 122