Temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis: Comparison of treatment with transport distraction osteogenesis or the Matthews Device arthroplasty

被引:23
作者
Gabbay, Joubin S.
Heller, Justin B.
Song, Yun Y.
Wasson, Kristy L.
Harrington, Heidi
Bradley, James P.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001665-200605000-00022
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) bony ankylosis with micrognathia is a rare congenital condition that is difficult to treat and may result in recurrence. In a series of affected patients, we compared two new methods of treatment: transport distraction osteogenesis and Matthews Device arthroplasty. All patients had computed tomography scan documented bilateral TMJ bony ankylosis. Group I (transport distraction osteogenesis) underwent distraction advancement of the mandible (for micrognathia) followed by resection of the condyles, recontouring of the glenoid fossas with interposition temporoparietal-fascial flaps, and transport distraction osteogenesis of mandibular rami segments. Group II (Matthews Device arthroplasty) underwent all of the above procedures except for transport distraction osteogenesis. Instead, the Matthews Devices were anchored to the temporal bone and mandibular rami. Hinged arms allowed for motion at the reconstructed TMJ. In both groups, patients underwent extensive postoperative therapy. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up lateral cephalograms were obtained, and incisor opening distances were recorded. All patients but one had severe micrognathia (n = 9). For group I (transport distraction osteogenesis), mean age was 6.8 years. and mean advancement was 28.5 mm. For group II (Matthews Device arthroplasty) mean age was 8.2 years, and mean advancement was 23.5 mm. In group I (transport distraction osteogenesis), mean incisor opening was 1 mm preoperatively and 27.5 mm postoperatively; however, it relapsed to 14.3 mm by 12.5 months follow-up (48% relapse). Mean incisor opening in group II (Matthews Device arthroplasty) was 3.9 nun preoperatively and 33.4 mm postoperatively and remained at 30.6 mm after 11.1 months follow-up (8% relapse). One patient in group I (transport distraction osteogenesis) underwent surgical revision because of relapse. Our data showed that for congenital TMJ bony ankylosis both transport distraction osteogenesis and Matthews Device arthroplasty techniques were successful initially; however, the Matthews Device arthroplasty avoided long-term relapse.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 522
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] ANTELL DE, 1991, GRABB SMITHS PLASTIC, P107
  • [2] Comparison of different materials for interposition arthroplasty in treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery: Long-term follow-up in 25 cases
    Chossegros, C
    Guyot, L
    Cheynet, F
    Blanc, JL
    Gola, R
    Bourezak, Z
    Conrath, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 35 (03) : 157 - 160
  • [3] CONSTANTINO PD, 1991, OTOLARYNG CLIN N AM, V24, P1433
  • [4] COSTANTINO PD, 1993, OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NEC, V119, P511
  • [5] Mandibular distraction in temporomandibular joint ankylosis
    Dean, A
    Alamillos, F
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 104 (07) : 2021 - 2031
  • [6] Bird face deformity secondary to bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis
    ElSheikh, MM
    Medra, AM
    Warda, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 24 (02): : 96 - 103
  • [7] Management of unilateral temporomandibular ankylosis associated with facial asymmetry
    ElSheikh, MM
    Medra, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 25 (03) : 109 - 115
  • [8] DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS IN THE IRRADIATED CANINE MANDIBLE
    GANTOUS, A
    PHILLIPS, JH
    CATTON, P
    HOLMBERG, D
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1994, 93 (01) : 164 - 168
  • [9] TREATMENT OUTCOMES FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT RECONSTRUCTION AFTER PROPLAST-TEFLON IMPLANT FAILURE
    HENRY, CH
    WOLFORD, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (04) : 352 - 358
  • [10] Experimental study of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a bone transport technique
    Hikiji, H
    Takato, T
    Matsumoto, S
    Mori, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (11) : 1270 - 1276