Comparison of two models for a pebble bed modular reactor core coupled to a Brayton cycle

被引:5
作者
Walter, A [1 ]
Schulz, A [1 ]
Lohnert, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Nucl Technol & Energy Syst, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.10.026
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The pebble bed modular reactor (PBMR) plant is a promising concept for inherently safe nuclear power generation. This paper presents two dynamic models for the core of a high temperature reactor (HTR) power plant with a helium gas turbine. Both the PBMR and its power conversion unit (PCU) based on a three-shaft, closed cycle, recuperative, inter-cooled Brayton cycle have been modeled with the network simulation code Flownex. One model utilizes a core simulation already incorporated in the Flownex software package, and the other a core simulation based on multidimensional neutronics and thermal-hydraulics. The reactor core modeled in Flownex is a simplified model, based on a zero-dimensional point-kinetics approach, whereas the other model represents a state-of-the-art approach for the solution of the neutron diffusion equations coupled to a thermal-hydraulic part describing realistic fuel temperatures during fast transients. Both reactor models were integrated into a complete cycle, which includes a PCU modeled in Flownex. Flownex is a thermal-hydraulic network analysis code that can calculate both steady-state and transient flows. An interesting feature of the code is its ability to allow the integration of an external program into Flownex by means of a so called memory map file. The total plant models are compared with each other by calculating representative transient cases demonstrating that the coupling with external models works sufficiently. To demonstrate the features of the external program a hypothetical fast increase of reactivity was simulated. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 614
页数:12
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 2 INT TOP M HIGH T
[2]   Models for reactor physics calculations for HTR pebble bed modular reactors [J].
Bernnat, W ;
Feltes, W .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2003, 222 (2-3) :331-347
[3]  
BOTHA BW, 2002, P IGTI TURB EXP AMST
[4]  
COETZEE RV, 2003, FLOWNEX VERSION 6 US
[5]  
DUTOIT CG, 2003, INT C ADV NUCL POW P
[6]   An implicit method for the analysis of transient flows in pipe networks [J].
Greyvenstein, GP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2002, 53 (05) :1127-1143
[7]  
GREYVENSTEIN GP, 2002, HTR ECS 2002 HIGH TE
[8]   RECRITICALITY OF THE HTR-MODULE POWER-REACTOR AFTER HYPOTHETICAL ACCIDENTS [J].
KINDT, T ;
HAQUE, H .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1992, 137 (01) :107-114
[9]  
ROUSSEAU PG, 2002, P 1 INT C HEAT TRANS