User's Self-Prediction of Performance in Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface

被引:28
|
作者
Ahn, Minkyu [1 ]
Cho, Hohyun [2 ]
Ahn, Sangtae [3 ]
Jun, Sung C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Handong Global Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Elect Engn, Pohang, South Korea
[2] New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, Albany, NY USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Gwangju Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Gwangju, South Korea
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
BCI-illiteracy; performance variation; prediction; motor imagery; BCI; SINGLE-TRIAL EEG; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; BCI PERFORMANCE; COMMUNICATION; CLASSIFICATION; FEEDBACK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2018.00059
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Performance variation is a critical issue in motor imagery brain-computer interface (MI-BCI), and various neurophysiological, psychological, and anatomical correlates have been reported in the literature. Although the main aim of such studies is to predict MI-BCI performance for the prescreening of poor performers, studies which focus on the user's sense of the motor imagery process and directly estimate MI-BCI performance through the user's self-prediction are lacking. In this study, we first test each user's self-prediction idea regarding motor imagery experimental datasets. Fifty-two subjects participated in a classical, two-class motor imagery experiment and were asked to evaluate their easiness with motor imagery and to predict their own MI-BCI performance. During the motor imagery experiment, an electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded; however, no feedback on motor imagery was given to subjects. From EEG recordings, the offline classification accuracy was estimated and compared with several questionnaire scores of subjects, as well as with each subject's self-prediction of MI-BCI performance. The subjects' performance predictions during motor imagery task showed a high positive correlation (r = 0.64, p < 0.01). Interestingly, it was observed that the self-prediction became more accurate as the subjects conducted more motor imagery tasks in the Correlation coefficient (pre-task to 2nd run: r D 0.02 to r D 0.54, p < 0.01) and root mean square error (pre-task to 3rd run: 17.7% to 10%, p < 0.01). We demonstrated that subjects may accurately predict their MI-BCI performance even without feedback information. This implies that the human brain is an active learning system and, by self-experiencing the endogenous motor imagery process, it can sense and adopt the quality of the process. Thus, it is believed that users may be able to predict MI-BCI performance and results may contribute to a better understanding of low performance and advancing BCI.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improved motor imagery training for subject's self-modulation in EEG-based brain-computer interface
    Xu, Yilu
    Jie, Lilin
    Jian, Wenjuan
    Yi, Wenlong
    Yin, Hua
    Peng, Yingqiong
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [42] Phase locking analysis of motor imagery in brain-computer interface
    Hu, Jianfeng
    Mu, Zhendong
    Wang, Jinli
    BMEI 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS, VOL 2, 2008, : 478 - 481
  • [43] Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface for RPAS Command and Control
    Arnaldo, Rosa
    Gomez Comendador, Fernando
    Perez, Luis
    Rodriguez, Alvaro
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS AND SYSTEMS INTERACTION, 2018, 592 : 325 - 335
  • [44] Improved motor imagery brain-computer interface performance via adaptive modulation filtering and two-stage classification
    dos Santos, Eliana M.
    Cassani, Raymundo
    Falk, Tiago H.
    Fraga, Francisco J.
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2020, 57 (57)
  • [45] Study of Wavelet-Based Performance Enhancement for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface
    Alansari, Mukhtar
    Kamel, Mahmoud
    Hakim, Bandar
    Kadah, Yasser
    2018 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE (BCI), 2018, : 138 - 141
  • [46] A Spiking Neural Network for Brain-Computer Interface of Four Classes Motor Imagery
    Li, Yulin
    Shen, Hui
    Hu, Dewen
    HUMAN BRAIN AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, HBAI 2022, 2023, 1692 : 148 - 160
  • [47] Symmetrical feature for interpreting motor imagery EEG signals in the brain-computer interface
    Park, Seung-Min
    Yu, Xinyang
    Chum, Pharino
    Lee, Woo-Young
    Sim, Kwee-Bo
    OPTIK, 2017, 129 : 163 - 171
  • [48] Improvement of brain-computer interface in motor imagery training through the designing of a dynamic experiment and FBCSP
    Lin, Chun-Ling
    Chen, Liang-Ting
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (03)
  • [49] On the Deep Learning Models for EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface Using Motor Imagery
    Zhu, Hao
    Forenzo, Dylan
    He, Bin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2022, 30 : 2283 - 2291
  • [50] Gamification of motor imagery brain-computer interface training protocols: A systematic review
    Atilla, Fred
    Postma, Marie
    Alimardani, Maryam
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2024, 16