Methodological breaching experiments: Steps toward theorizing the qualitative interview

被引:20
作者
Brinkmann, Svend [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Commun & Psychol, Psychol, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Qualitat Studies, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Interview; ethnomethodology; theory; breaching experiment; culture; qualitative;
D O I
10.1177/1354067X16650816
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The qualitative research interview is arguably the most widespread method of inquiry across the human and social sciences today. In spite of its popularity, there is a significant lack of theoretical reflection concerning this qualitative method of inquiry. On the background of other scholars' recent experiences with interviewing in different cultural settings, this article begins to develop a theoretical account of qualitative interviewing. First, intercultural interviews are considered as methodological breaching experiments that enable us to better understand the intricacies of a practice that is otherwise taken for granted. Next, I argue that this should lead to a denaturalization of the interview. Qualitative interviewing must be considered not simply as a neutral instrument, capable of representing a "natural" human relationship, but rather as a social practice with a history that provides a specific context for human interaction and knowledge production. Some significant elements of this context are finally spelled out.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 533
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Atkinson P., 1997, QUAL INQ, V3, P304
[2]   Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary society [J].
Briggs, Charles L. .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2007, 48 (04) :551-580
[3]  
Brinkmann S., 2020, The oxford handbook of qualitative research, P277, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199811755.013.030
[4]  
Brinkmann S., 2013, Qualitative Interviewing: Understanding Qualitative Research
[5]  
Brinkmann S., 2015, Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, V3rd
[6]   Could interviews be epistemic? An alternative to qualitative opinion polling [J].
Brinkmann, Svend .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2007, 13 (08) :1116-1138
[7]  
Denzin N., 2001, Qualitative Research: QR, V1, P23
[8]  
Dewey J., 1925, EXPERIENCE NATURE
[9]  
Dilley R., 1999, PROBLEM CONTEXT, P1
[10]  
Foley LJ., 2012, SAGE HDB INTERVIEW R, V2nd Editio, P305