Dynamic Trends of Urban Flooding Mitigation Services in Shenzhen, China

被引:14
作者
Xu, Dihang [1 ,2 ]
Ouyang, Zhiyun [1 ]
Wu, Tong [1 ]
Han, Baolong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
urbanization; flood mitigation; runoff retention; ecosystem service; Shenzhen; China; LAND-USE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su12114799
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urbanization is characterized by population agglomeration and the expansion of impervious land surfaces. As a result of ongoing urbanization, rain and flood events have increasingly affected the well-being of residents in cities across the world. This should draw attention to the role of urban ecosystems in providing runoff retention/flood mitigation services. Focusing on Shenzhen, a major city in southern China, we used a hydrologic model based on the Soil Conservation Service curve number (SCS-CN) model to evaluate this flood reduction ecosystem service and its dynamic trends based on long-term remote sensing data from 1980 to 2018. We find that Shenzhen's capacity for flood reduction gradually decreased due to changes in land use. The spatial distribution showed strong reduction capacity in the eastern part of the city and weak capacity in the western part. Additionally, the city's total flood reduction capacity decreased by over 1.88 x 10(8) m(3) over the past two decades. This loss of ecosystem-based flood reduction capacity undermines Shenzhen's resilience against extreme weather events. Due to climate change, Shenzhen should advance its plan to build a "Sponge City" rooted in the conservation, restoration, and construction of urban ecological spaces.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Abbot CL, 2003, J CHART INST WATER E, V17, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2003.tb00460.x
  • [2] American Forests, 2002, CITYGREEN CALC VAL N
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, World development indicators
  • [4] Beven K. J., 2011, Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer, DOI 10.1002/9781119951001
  • [5] A REVIEW OF THE USDA SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD
    BOUGHTON, WC
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1989, 27 (03): : 511 - 523
  • [6] Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models
    Clark, Martyn P.
    Slater, Andrew G.
    Rupp, David E.
    Woods, Ross A.
    Vrugt, Jasper A.
    Gupta, Hoshin V.
    Wagener, Thorsten
    Hay, Lauren E.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44
  • [7] Watering our cities: The capacity for Water Sensitive Urban Design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context
    Coutts, Andrew M.
    Tapper, Nigel J.
    Beringer, Jason
    Loughnan, Margaret
    Demuzere, Matthias
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 37 (01): : 2 - 28
  • [8] CRED, 2020, CRED CRUNCH 58 DIS Y
  • [9] Performance and implementation of low impact development - A review
    Eckart, Kyle
    McPhee, Zach
    Bolisetti, Tirupati
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 607 : 413 - 432
  • [10] Gajbhiye S., 2012, 2012 International Conference on Advances in Engineering, Science and Management (ICAESM), P346