Effectiveness of green tea mouthwash in postoperative pain control following surgical removal of impacted third molars: double blind randomized clinical trial

被引:15
|
作者
Eshghpour, Majid [1 ]
Mortazavi, Hamed [2 ]
Rezaei, Naser Mohammadzadeh [3 ]
Nejat, AmirHossein [4 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial, Dental Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Med, Tehran, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Mashhad, Iran
[4] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Mashhad, Iran
来源
DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES | 2013年 / 21卷
关键词
Camellia sinensis; Impacted third molar; Mouthwash; Oral surgery; Postoperative pain; ORAL-SURGERY; COMPARATIVE EFFICACY; COMPLICATIONS; PARACETAMOL; PLACEBO; ETODOLAC; DIFLUNISAL; EXTRACTION; MANAGEMENT; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1186/2008-2231-21-59
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Pain following surgical removal of impacted molars has remained an important concern among practitioners. Various protocols have been proposed to reduce postoperative pain. However, each one has special side effects and limitations. As green tea possesses anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of green tea mouthwash in controlling postoperative pain. Materials and methods: In a study with split-mouth and double blind design, 44 patients in need of bilateral removal of impacted third molars underwent randomized surgical extraction; following one surgery patients rinsed with a green tea mouthwash from the first to seventh postoperative day and after other extraction rinsed with placebo mouthwash in the same duration. Both patients and surgeon were blinded to the type of mouthwash. The predictor variable was type of mouthwash and primary outcome variable was postoperative pain measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) during first week after surgery. In addition, number of analgesics patients used after surgery recorded. To measure the effect of green tea mouthwash, repeated measures test with confidence interval of 95% was performed. Results: Total of 43 patients with mean age of 24 years underwent total of 86 surgeries. VAS value had no statistically difference prior rinsing among groups (P-value > 0.05). However, the mean value of VAS following rinsing with green tea was statistically lower than placebo in postoperative days of 3-7 (P-value < 0.05). In addition, while rinsing with green tea, patients took significantly lower number of analgesics after surgery (P-value < 0.05). No side effects reported. Conclusion: Green tea mouthwash could be an appropriate and safe choice to control postoperative pain after third molar surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Does the "Root Removal First" strategy prevent postoperative complications in the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in the Pell and Gregory class C and horizontal position? - a randomized clinical trial
    Wang, Bing
    Sun, Rui
    Li, Tingting
    Sun, Yuqi
    Zheng, Linwei
    Zhao, Jihong
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [12] Acupuncture on anxiety and inflammatory events following surgery of mandibular third molars: a split-mouth, randomized, triple-blind clinical trial
    Armond, A. C. V.
    Gloria, J. C. R.
    dos Santos, C. R. R.
    Galo, R.
    Falci, S. G. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (02) : 274 - 281
  • [13] A double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial of the effect of preoperative ibuprofen, diclofenac, paracetamol with codeine and placebo tablets for relief of postoperative pain after removal of impacted third molars
    Joshi, A
    Parara, E
    Macfarlane, TV
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 42 (04) : 299 - 306
  • [14] A randomized double-blind comparative study of Biolight® light therapy following surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars
    Kashani, Hossein
    Kanagaraja, Sanjiv
    Kahnberg, Karl-Erik
    SWEDISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2007, 31 (04) : 165 - 170
  • [15] Effect of orally administered magnesium on postoperative pain level and trismus after surgical removal of the lower third molars: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Jerkovic, Daniel
    Tadin, Antonija
    Gavic, Lidia
    Vladislavic, Nada Zorica
    Grgic, Nino
    Macan, Darko
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (12) : 4649 - 4659
  • [16] Effectiveness of nicotine patch for the control of pain, oedema, and trismus following third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Landim, F. S.
    Laureano Filho, J. R.
    Nascimento, J.
    do Egito Vasconcelos, B. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (11) : 1508 - 1517
  • [17] A prospective randomized double-blind study to assess the latency and efficacy of articaine and lignocaine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in Indian patients
    Sreekumar, K.
    Bhargava, Darpan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY & OCCLUSION MEDICINE, 2012, 5 (01) : 10 - 14
  • [18] Effect of preemptive dexamethasone and etoricoxib on postoperative period following impacted third molar surgery - a randomized clinical trial
    Rocha Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel
    Pereira, Gabriela Soares
    do Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti
    Ribeiro, Renato da Costa
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2019, 24 (06): : E746 - E751
  • [19] Effect of Photobiomodulation on the Incidence of Alveolar Osteitis and Postoperative Pain following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Nejat, Amir Hossein
    Eshghpour, Majid
    Danaeifar, Nasrin
    Abrishami, Majid
    Vahdatinia, Farshid
    Fekrazad, Reza
    PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 2021, 97 (05) : 1129 - 1135
  • [20] Efficacy of a drug composed of herbal extracts on postoperative discomfort after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a randomized, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial
    Isola, Gaetano
    Matarese, Marco
    Ramaglia, Luca
    Iorio-Siciliano, Vincenzo
    Cordasco, Giancarlo
    Matarese, Giovanni
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (05) : 2443 - 2453