Preventive maintenance versus cost of repairs in asset management: An efficiency analysis in wastewater treatment plants

被引:17
作者
Hernandez-Chover, Vicent [1 ]
Castellet-Viciano, Lledo [1 ]
Hernandez-Sancho, Francesc [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Water Econ Grp, Inst Local Dev ILD WATER, Avda Tarongers S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
Infrastructure management; Preventive maintenance; Repairs; Efficiency; Risk management; Operating costs; Energy consumption; ENERGY; SERVICES; INDUSTRY; SCALE; OPTIMIZATION; BENCHMARKING; UTILITIES; SPEARMANS; OUTPUTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The operation and management of Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) is of paramount importance to guarantee the sustainability of water resources. Just like any other production process, wastewater treatment process involves different costs, such as: energy, personnel, maintenance and reagents. Regarding maintenance costs, they have become an issue of great concern to many operators in the last years. Maintaining the facilities in good condition ensures the proper performance of these infrastructures and reduces the risk of failures. It should be known that equipment breakdowns imply an increase in operating costs, with a high risk of generating an environmental damage due to the malfunction or the stoppage of the process. To address this situation, preventive maintenance polices are portrayed as the best strategies to reduce equipment breakdowns and repairs. Although maintenance costs are a relevant issue for wastewater treatment plant operators, there are not many studies that assess the influence of maintenance on the efficiency of the facilities. In order to fill this gap an empirical study is proposed for a sample of wastewater treatment plants facilities. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 221
页数:7
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Productivity and efficiency in the water industry [J].
Abbott, Malcolm ;
Cohen, Bruce .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2009, 17 (3-4) :233-244
[2]  
Albaladejo, 2013, TECNOAQUA, P48
[3]  
Alegre H., 2009, STRATEGIC ASSET MANA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OPER RES, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12351-015-0207-8.
[5]  
Biehl WH, 2010, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V102, P50
[6]   Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting [J].
Bloomrosen, Meryl ;
Starren, Justin ;
Lorenzi, Nancy M. ;
Ash, Joan S. ;
Patel, Vimla L. ;
Shortliffe, Edward H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 18 (01) :82-90
[7]   The economics of aging infrastructure [J].
KEMA ;
不详 ;
不详 .
IEEE Power Energ. Mag., 2006, 3 (36-43) :36-43
[8]   A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure [J].
Carvaho, Pedro ;
Marques, Rui Cunha ;
Berg, Sanford .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2012, 21 :40-49
[9]   The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities [J].
Carvalho, Pedro ;
Marques, Rui Cunha .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (10) :2698-2707
[10]   Modelling the energy costs of the wastewater treatment process: The influence of the aging factor [J].
Castellet-Viciano, Lledo ;
Hernandez-Chover, Vicent ;
Hernandez-Sancho, Francesc .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 625 :363-372