Is HbA1c appropriate for the screening of diabetes in general pratice?

被引:0
作者
Papoz, L [1 ]
Favier, F
Sanchez, A
Clabé, A
Caillens, H
Boyer, MC
Schwager, JC
机构
[1] INSERM, Unite 500, 39 Av Charles Flahault, F-34093 Montpellier 5, France
[2] GHSR, Biol Lab, St Pierre, Reunion, France
[3] CHD Felix Guyon, Biol Lab, St Denis, Reunion, France
[4] CHD Felix Guyon, Serv Diabet, St Denis, Reunion, France
[5] GHSR, Serv Diabetol, St Pierre, Reunion, France
关键词
diabetes; screening; plasma Glucose; HbA(1c);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) is a practical and more sensitive tool than fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in screening type 2 diabetes in current practice. Its use has been limited so far by the variability of the analytical methods. The standardization process is going on, and many laboratories are currently using valid methods. Our study is consistent with the results of other groups who recommended this measurement to identify undiagnosed diabetic patients, that are about 25% to 30% in the French population. The demonstration was provided through a survey including a screening step by both HbA(1c) and G0, and a second exam with a 2 hr OGTT in a sample of positive screenees according to at least one criterion (HbA(1c) greater than or equal to 6% or G0 greater than or equal to 1.26 g/L), as well as in a sample of negative screenees. We showed that nine confirmed diabetic subjects out of ten had HbA(1c) greater than or equal to 6% at the screening step, while only a half had GO greater than or equal to 1.26 g/L. Conversely, 22% of the positive screenees according to HbA(1c) were not confirmed as diabetic by the OGTT. including however more than half with abnormal glucose values. A chart for practical use is proposed to define patients at risk, the process of screening, and the patient follow-up according to the results of the tests.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 77
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] The 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria versus the 1985 World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of abnormal glucose tolerance - Poor agreement in the Hoorn study
    De Vegt, F
    Dekker, JM
    Stehouwer, CDA
    Nijpels, G
    Bouter, LM
    Heine, R
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (10) : 1686 - 1690
  • [2] *DECODE STUD GROUP, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P1343
  • [3] *DIAB CONTR COMPL, 1993, NEW ENGL J MED, V329, P77
  • [4] Fontbonne A, 1996, DIABETES METAB, V22, P305
  • [5] Gavin JR, 1997, DIABETES CARE, V20, P1183
  • [6] Evaluation of GHb assays in France by national quality control surveys
    Gillery, P
    Dumont, G
    Vassault, A
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (02) : 265 - 270
  • [7] Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk)
    Khaw, KT
    Wareham, N
    Luben, R
    Bingham, S
    Oakes, S
    Welch, A
    Day, N
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7277): : 15 - 18B
  • [8] Standardization of HbA1c measurements -: a consensus statement
    Marshall, SM
    Barth, JH
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [9] COMPARISON OF TESTS FOR GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN AND FASTING AND 2 HOUR PLASMA-GLUCOSE CONCENTRATIONS AS DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR DIABETES
    MCCANCE, DR
    HANSON, RL
    CHARLES, MA
    JACOBSSON, LTH
    PETTITT, DJ
    BENNETT, PH
    KNOWLER, WC
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6940) : 1323 - 1328
  • [10] GHb (HbA1c) is more sensitive than fasting blood glucose as a screening test for diabetes
    Papoz, L
    Favier, F
    Clabé, A
    Sanchez, A
    Le Moullec, N
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (08) : 1206 - 1207