Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: Single institution analysis

被引:7
作者
Ghomi, Ali [1 ]
Nolan, William [1 ]
Rodgers, Bruce [1 ]
机构
[1] Sisters Charity Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2157 Main St, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
关键词
computer-assisted surgery; fertility; gynaecology; infertility; micro surgery; minimal invasive surgery; obstetrics; reproductive systems; tubal anastomosis; tubal reversal; REANASTOMOSIS; COST;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.2155
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Tubal anastomosis has similar pregnancy rates regardless of approach. Historically, robotic anastomosis has been associated with increased cost and operative time. We sought to perform a contemporary study of these metrics. Methods One hundred and nine patients were identified who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. Phone survey was conducted. Results The mean operative time decreased from 140.7 +/- 27.0 min in 2013 to 60.0 +/- 9.1 min in 2018, with significant downward trend (p< 0.001). The mean cost was $7153.46 +/- $1484.41. The pregnancy rate was 59% (35/59), and tubal patency rate was 81% (42/52). Seventy-two percent of patients under 37 years became pregnant. Conclusions There is significant improvement in operative time of robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with surgical experience. Robotic tubal anastomosis outperformed historical metrics of laparoscopy and laparotomy with regard to operative time and cost in this series.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF?
    Boeckxstaens, An
    Devroey, Paul
    Collins, John
    Tournaye, Herman
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (10) : 2660 - 2664
  • [2] Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study
    Caillet, Martin
    Vandromme, Jean
    Rozenberg, Serge
    Paesmans, Marianne
    Germay, Olivier
    Degueldre, Michel
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (05) : 1844 - 1847
  • [3] Daniels K., 2018, Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-49: United States, 2015-2017
  • [4] Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis:: a feasibility study
    Degueldre, M
    Vandromme, J
    Huong, PT
    Cadière, GB
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (05) : 1020 - 1023
  • [5] Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: A case report
    Falcone, T
    Goldberg, J
    Garcia-Ruiz, A
    Margossian, H
    Stevens, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 1999, 9 (01): : 107 - 113
  • [6] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study
    Falcone, T
    Goldberg, JM
    Margossian, H
    Stevens, L
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) : 1040 - 1042
  • [7] Achieving robotic program best practice performance and cost versus laparoscopy: Two case studies define a framework for optimization
    Feldstein, Josh
    Coussons, Herbert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (03)
  • [8] Robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis: Initial experience in a single institution
    Gocmen, Ahmet
    Sanlikan, Fatih
    Ucar, Mustafa Gazi
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 52 (01): : 77 - 80
  • [9] Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance
    Goldberg, JM
    Falcone, T
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (01) : 145 - 147
  • [10] Poststerilization regret: Findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization
    Hillis, SD
    Marchbanks, PA
    Tylor, LR
    Peterson, HB
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (06) : 889 - 895