Accounting for loop flexibility during protein-protein docking

被引:73
|
作者
Bastard, K
Prévost, C
Zacharias, M
机构
[1] Inst Biol Physicochim, Lab Biochim Theor, UPR 9080, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Int Univ Bremen, Sch Sci & Engn, Bremen, Germany
关键词
flexible protein-protein docking; docking minimization; loop flexibility; reduced protein models; mean-field theory;
D O I
10.1002/prot.20770
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Although reliable docking can now be achieved for systems that do not undergo important induced conformational change upon association, the presence of flexible surface loops, which must adapt to the steric and electrostatic properties of a partner, generally presents a major obstacle. We report here the first docking method that allows large loop movements during a systematic exploration of the possible arrangements of the two partners in terms of position and rotation. Our strategy consists in taking into account an ensemble of possible loop conformations by a multi-copy representation within a reduced protein model. The docking process starts from regularly distributed positions and orientations of the ligand around the whole receptor. Each starting configuration is submitted to energy minimization during which the best-fitting loop conformation is selected based on the mean-field theory. Trials were carried out on proteins with significant differences in the main-chain conformation of the binding loop between isolated form and complexed form, which were docked to their partner considered in their bound form. The method is able to predict complexes very close to the crystal complex both in terms of relative position of the two partners and of the geometry of the flexible loop. We also show that introducing loop flexibility on the isolated protein form during systematic docking largely improves the predictions of relative position of the partners in comparison with rigid-body docking.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 969
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side chain and loop flexibility
    Zacharias, M
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 82 (01) : 9A - 9A
  • [2] Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking
    Zacharias, Martin
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 180 - 186
  • [3] Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility
    Zacharias, M
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (06) : 1271 - 1282
  • [4] Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility
    Wang, Chu
    Bradley, Philip
    Baker, David
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2007, 373 (02) : 503 - 519
  • [5] The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking
    Ehrlich, LP
    Nilges, M
    Wade, RC
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 58 (01) : 126 - 133
  • [6] Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking
    May, A
    Zacharias, M
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS, 2005, 1754 (1-2): : 225 - 231
  • [7] The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking
    Smith, GR
    Sternberg, MJE
    Bates, PA
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 347 (05) : 1077 - 1101
  • [8] ProPOSE: Direct Exhaustive Protein-Protein Docking with Side Chain Flexibility
    Hogues, Herve
    Gaudreault, Francis
    Corbeil, Christopher R.
    Deprez, Christophe
    Sulea, Traian
    Purisima, Enrico O.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 14 (09) : 4938 - 4947
  • [9] Challenges and Advantages of Accounting for Backbone Flexibility in Prediction of Protein-Protein Complexes
    Faruk, Nabil F.
    Peng, Xiangda
    Freed, Karl F.
    Roux, Benoit
    Sosnick, Tobin R.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2022, 18 (03) : 2016 - 2032
  • [10] Protein-Protein Docking
    Ehrlich, Lutz P.
    Wade, Rebecca C.
    REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 17, 2001, 17 : 61 - 97